From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 22:31:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 22:31:33 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-142.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.142]:11995 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 22:31:33 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: 2.5.19 - What's up with the kernel build? Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 04:30:58 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Thunder from the hill , Tomas Szepe , Jeff Garzik , Paul P Komkoff Jr , lkml In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 30 May 2002 04:23, you wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > If that's not the case then let's go people and speak up, advocate for > patches in secondary trees, send your appreciation to Linus and lkml, but > don't stay still. The preemptive kernel patch just to name that example > got much more visibility, adoption and promotion than what kb25 had up to > now. Sure, and I had a large hand in that. But I'll tell you this, I'm *tired* of uphill battles. It's a major use or waste of my time, even when successful, and I do not like making a pest of myself. I'm sure this particular battle is going to be successful, but I'm not going to fight it. I've said my piece and I have other things to do. -- Daniel