From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.21: kbuild changes broke filenames with commas
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:36:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17HodQ-0000AV-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020609175804.B8761@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <E17HoBz-0000A0-00@starship> <20020611173147.C3665@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 18:31, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:08:22PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Are you sure that complexity was added just to handle commas in names?
> > Or is it really an example of how good design never gave this bug a
> > chance to exist in the first palce.
> >
> > I *really* don't like the idea of papering over such bugs by curing the
> > symptoms, as you seem to be advocating.
>
> Lets see.
>
> We have two places in 2.5.21 where commas are unacceptable:
>
> 1. -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F)))
>
> We need to do this because to do because KBUILD_BASENAME is used in
> places where commas are not acceptable.
>
> We papered over the fact that make can't subst commas by using the
> $(comma) construct.
>
> 2. -Wp,-MD,.$(subst /,_,$@).d (currently unfixed)
>
> This would need to become something like:
>
> -Wp,-MD,.$(subst /,_,$(subst $(comma,_,$@)).d
>
> So now we have two places where the same yucky substing of commas to
> something more palettable happens. Now, what if we had:
>
> foo,bar.c
>
> and
>
> foo_bar.c
>
> in the same directory? The kbuild system goes wrong, destroying dependency
> information, using the wrong KBUILD_BASENAME. Oops. I guess we papered
> over a bug by allowing commas in filenames.
Yup.
> In addition, I'd like to point out the following paragraph in the make
> info files:
>
> The variant variables' names are formed by
> appending `D' or `F', respectively. These variants are semi-obsolete
> in GNU `make' since the functions `dir' and `notdir' can be used to get
> a similar effect (*note Functions for File Names: File Name
> Functions.).
>
> Both kbuild-2.5 and the existing kernel build make heavy use of the
> "$(*F)" notation. Should we really be putting semi-obsolete features
> into either of the kernel build system?
No, agreed. Now this is sensible.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-11 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-09 16:58 2.5.21: kbuild changes broke filenames with commas Russell King
2002-06-09 17:11 ` Upper limits to number of processes / threads in Linux / ia32?? M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-06-09 18:02 ` 2.5.21: kbuild changes broke filenames with commas Kai Germaschewski
2002-06-09 18:34 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 23:02 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-11 7:39 ` Russell King
2002-06-11 11:11 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 11:21 ` Russell King
2002-06-11 12:16 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 13:01 ` Russell King
2002-06-12 14:36 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-12 18:10 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-13 20:12 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 16:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-11 16:14 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-11 16:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-11 16:31 ` Russell King
2002-06-11 16:36 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-11 23:55 Keith Owens
2002-06-12 0:27 ` Kai Germaschewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17HodQ-0000AV-00@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox