From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Optimisation for smp_num_cpus loop in hotplug
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:14:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17LQ7b-0000Iz-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:41:52 -0400." <200206202341.g5KNfqU07377@localhost.localdomain>
In message <200206202341.g5KNfqU07377@localhost.localdomain> you write:
> The hotplug CPU patch introduces this to replace the loop over all active CPUs
> abstraction:
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> if (!cpu_online(i))
> continue;
Yeah, it's simple, and none of the current ones are really critical.
But I think we're better off with:
for (i = first_cpu(); i < NR_CPUS; i = next_cpu(i)) {
Which is simple enough not to need an iterator macro, and also has the
bonus of giving irq-balancing et al. an efficient, portable way of
looking for the "next" cpu.
Cheers!
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
Name: CPU iterator patch
Author: Rusty Russell
Status: Trivial
D: This patch adds first_cpu() & next_cpu(cpu) for more efficient cpu
D: iteration.
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.24/include/asm-i386/smp.h working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-i386/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.24/include/asm-i386/smp.h Thu Jun 20 01:28:51 2002
+++ working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-i386/smp.h Sat Jun 22 00:55:46 2002
@@ -107,6 +107,18 @@
return -1;
}
+/* x86 is always linear, ie. cpu_online(0) always true at the moment. */
+static inline unsigned int first_cpu(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Return "next" online cpu. Returns NR_CPUS on end. */
+static inline unsigned int next_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return find_next_bit(&cpu_online_map, NR_CPUS, cpu+1);
+}
+
static __inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
{
/* we don't want to mark this access volatile - bad code generation */
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.24/include/asm-ia64/smp.h working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-ia64/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.24/include/asm-ia64/smp.h Thu Jun 20 01:28:51 2002
+++ working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-ia64/smp.h Sat Jun 22 00:59:34 2002
@@ -45,6 +45,17 @@
extern unsigned long ap_wakeup_vector;
+static inline unsigned int first_cpu(void)
+{
+ return __ffs(cpu_online_map);
+}
+
+/* Return "next" online cpu. Returns NR_CPUS on end. */
+static inline unsigned int next_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return find_next_bit(&cpu_online_map, NR_CPUS, cpu+1);
+}
+
#define cpu_online(cpu) (cpu_online_map & (1<<(cpu)))
extern inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
{
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.24/include/asm-ppc/smp.h working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-ppc/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.24/include/asm-ppc/smp.h Thu Jun 20 01:28:51 2002
+++ working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-ppc/smp.h Sat Jun 22 00:58:37 2002
@@ -47,6 +47,17 @@
#define smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
+static inline unsigned int first_cpu(void)
+{
+ return __ffs(cpu_online_map);
+}
+
+/* Return "next" online cpu. Returns NR_CPUS on end. */
+static inline unsigned int next_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return find_next_bit(&cpu_online_map, NR_CPUS, cpu+1);
+}
+
#define cpu_online(cpu) (cpu_online_map & (1<<(cpu)))
extern inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.24/include/asm-sparc64/smp.h working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-sparc64/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.24/include/asm-sparc64/smp.h Fri Jun 21 09:41:55 2002
+++ working-2.5.24-cpu-iter/include/asm-sparc64/smp.h Sat Jun 22 01:06:58 2002
@@ -77,6 +77,17 @@
return -1;
}
+static inline unsigned int first_cpu(void)
+{
+ return __ffs(cpu_online_map);
+}
+
+/* Return "next" online cpu. Returns NR_CPUS on end. */
+static inline unsigned int next_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return find_next_bit(&cpu_online_map, NR_CPUS, cpu+1);
+}
+
/*
* General functions that each host system must provide.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-21 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-20 23:41 Optimisation for smp_num_cpus loop in hotplug James Bottomley
2002-06-21 15:14 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-06-21 15:31 ` James Bottomley
2002-06-21 19:17 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <mailman.1024617156.25656.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-06-21 4:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-06-21 13:10 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17LQ7b-0000Iz-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox