From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] misc fixes
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17ZJ84-0004s4-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207291751160.3086-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Monday 29 July 2002 22:55, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > At some point, when the reverse map is as CPU efficient as we can make
> > it, we need to decide whether the remaining cost is worth the benefit.
> > I wonder how to do that.
>
> On a system which isn't swapping, the pte_chain based reverse
> maps will never be worth it. However, it seems that well over
> 90% of Linux machines have data in swap ...
There is also the promise of being able to do active defragmentation, an
enabler for large pages, which have been shown to significantly enhance
performance due to reduced tlb pressure.
So the 'never will be worth it' case is limited to loads that don't create
any tlb pressure and don't do any swapping or mmap IO.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-29 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-28 7:32 [patch 1/13] misc fixes Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 7:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-29 8:44 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-29 8:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-29 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 20:55 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-29 22:36 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-07-29 21:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-31 22:22 ` Rmap setup/teardown suckage Daniel Phillips
2002-07-30 10:11 ` [patch 1/13] misc fixes Daniel Phillips
2002-07-30 10:18 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17ZJ84-0004s4-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox