From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:37:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:37:14 -0400 Received: from mx8.mail.ru ([194.67.57.18]:29967 "EHLO mx8.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:37:14 -0400 From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [2.5.43] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 194.226.0.89 via proxy [194.226.0.63] Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:42:45 +0400 Reply-To: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org looking at that i realise that DAC960 code in 2.5.43 is not supposed to be tested: ====== #error I am a non-portable driver, please convert me to use the Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt interfaces ====== am i right? the following weirdo appears in both gcc-3.1 and 3.2 (also in 2.5.42) ====== drivers/block/DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_DetectControllers': drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: `Controller' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: for each function it appears in.) --- cheers, Samium Gromoff ______________________________________ _____________________________________