From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S264045AbUEHCMw@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264045AbUEHCMw (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 7 May 2004 22:12:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264054AbUEHCMw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 7 May 2004 22:12:52 -0400
Received: from mail1-115.ewetel.de ([212.6.122.115]:56449 "EHLO
	mail1.ewetel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264045AbUEHCMw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 May 2004 22:12:52 -0400
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Distributions vs kernel development
In-Reply-To: <1TfVQ-4T4-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <1TfVQ-4T4-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 21:41:13 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BMBDd-0000GZ-1k@localhost>
From: Pascal Schmidt <der.eremit@email.de>
X-CheckCompat: OK
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 07 May 2004 18:00:22 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel:
> After having being burned twice: first by Mandrake and supermount, and second
> by SuSe and reiserfs attributes; are any of the distributions committed to
> making sure that their distribution will run the standard kernel? (ie. 2.6.X from
> kernel.org).

Slackware, both -current and 9.1. Don't expect fancy initscripts
handling every possible thing you could boot off for you, though.

-- 
Ciao,
Pascal