From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267779AbUHXNEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:04:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267785AbUHXNEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail5.ewetel.de ([212.6.122.32]:51607 "EHLO mail5.ewetel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267779AbUHXNEh (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:04:37 -0400 To: Joerg Schilling Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? In-Reply-To: <2wAWW-12a-11@gated-at.bofh.it> References: <2wAWW-12a-11@gated-at.bofh.it> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:04:22 +0200 Message-Id: From: Pascal Schmidt X-CheckCompat: OK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 06:20:06 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel: > Dou you know of any other system where you can say: > > Print me a strack trace with symbols for all processes on this > computer (even stripped ones) that call gettimeofday() within the > next few seconds. Well, this is by far off-topic here now, but how does this solve the general problem of knowing that gettimeofday() might be a problem in the given situation? But yeah, once you know that, the functionality is useful, no doubt. -- Ciao, Pascal