public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	debburn-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: broken device locking, sg vs. sg_io on block devices
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:34:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HXptY-00017P-FP@flower> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070401011452.7c0cbce9@the-village.bc.nu>

> From: Alan Cox
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: Re: broken device locking, sg vs. sg_io on block devices
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:14:52 +0100
>
[]
>> Again, it doesn't have to. It can pass the locking operations to the
>> related block device driver.
>
> No it can't. The driver has no idea what the locking rules are for
> arbitary command blocks send to arbitary devices. /dev/sg is a *raw*
> interface. You can send anything to anyone, and the locking rules for
> that are far too complex for a giant morass of kernel code to get added.
>
> The mess begins because you use /dev/sg and put it in a cdrom group
> instead of using SG_IO on the /dev/sr device.

(offtop: 'cdrom' is as ugly as 'floppy' for anything like usb,
firewire connected storage, why not use 'optics' and 'external' or
something?)

> The mess continues because of the user of O_EXCL locking thus forcing
> re-open/close by HAL

Manpage states something bad about it also...

> instead of fcntl based co-operative locking.

> > > getty/modem/uucp/terminal emulator/slip/ppp/..

Programs you've mentioned may have co-operative locking, but 'dd' or
'cat' have no knowledge of it for sure. Yet nothing prevents allowed user
program to use this tools on /dev/tty*.

AFAIK kernel developers are always ready for very broken userspace, yet
co-operative locking is a job of the userspace programmers of very
different tools.

> The job of the kernel is not and never has been to anticipate and correct
> everything stupid someone tries to do in user space.


> As I said before the people wanting to arbitrate serial ports got this
> right in the mid 1970's your situation is not much more complicated,

Do you mean co-operative locking or carrier detection as a pre-hotplug
thing (:?

Tell me, please, somebody, why non-exclusive co-operative locking (if it
was implemented anyways), racy and already used in userspace applications
O_EXCL are better than _mandatory locking_? I've found this helpful against
any broken userspace, trying hijack my device and read or write bytes
to it.
____

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-01  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200703261811.21448.gerald@itzgrund.net>
2007-03-30 11:17 ` broken device locking, sg vs. sg_io on block devices Eduard Bloch
2007-03-30 13:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-30 14:21     ` Eduard Bloch
2007-03-30 18:10       ` Alan Cox
2007-03-31 17:07         ` Eduard Bloch
2007-03-31 22:20           ` Alan Cox
2007-03-31 22:40             ` Eduard Bloch
2007-04-01  0:14               ` Alan Cox
2007-04-01  2:34                 ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2007-04-07 11:21             ` Eduard Bloch
2007-04-11 10:12               ` Eduard Bloch
2007-04-11 11:31                 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-11 12:19                   ` Eduard Bloch
2007-03-30 19:09       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1HXptY-00017P-FP@flower \
    --to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=debburn-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    --cc=edi@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox