Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink

Oleg Verych
2007-09-02T17:01:22Z

* Sun, 2 Sep 2007 16:03:07 +0200
>
> Hi. My name may not ring a bell for lots of lklm members.

Hallo, Marc. It's OK; shit happens, calm down, please.

[]
> Well, if that's truely the case, I may reconsider my good faith for future
> contributions. Heck, instead of giving away my code under the GPL, I could
> keep my contributions in the form of patches. Ironically, with tools such
> as git, this is no longer as cumbersome as this used to be. So, instead
> of new gcc code sent to the FSF (and given to the FSF), we could explicitly
> keep patches under the ISC licence, and explain loudly why this is so.

About GCC this is a good point. Seconded. Maybe then `sparse' by Linus
and friends will be a good competitor for that FSF guarded pet...

[]
> Nice going, GPL fan-boys...

HA-ha. Shit hits the fan-boys.

GPL is not FSF. GPL or FSF is not Debian. Linux is (was?) for FUN.

Good bye.
--
-o--=O`C info emacs-manual : not found /. .\ ( is there any reason to live? )
#oo'L O info make : not found o ( yes --- R.I.P. FSF + RMS )
<___=E M man gcc : not found `-- ( viva Debian Operating System )