public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: "Joerg Roedel" <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 18:04:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1IfHZg-0003dp-FA@flower> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11919341961530-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>

* Tue,  9 Oct 2007 14:49:55 +0200

[]
> @@ -33,9 +33,20 @@ void fastcall (*machine_check_vector)(struct pt_regs *, long error_code) = unexp
>  /* This has to be run for each processor */
>  void mcheck_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
> +	uint32_t mca, mce;
> +
>  	if (mce_disabled==1)
>  		return;
>  
> +	mca = cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCA);
> +	mce = cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE);
> +
> +	if (!mca || !mce) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n",
> +			smp_processor_id());
> +		return;
> +	}
> +

cpu_has() returns int,
but would it be better to have something like

  	if (!mce_disabled &&
	    !(c->x86_capability & (X86_FEATURE_MCA | X86_FEATURE_MCE)) {
		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n",
			smp_processor_id());
		return;
	} else
		return;
?
____

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-09 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-09 12:49 [PATCH 0/2] i386: MCE updates Joerg Roedel
2007-10-09 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change Joerg Roedel
2007-10-09 16:04   ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2007-10-09 16:06     ` Joerg Roedel
2007-10-09 16:32       ` Oleg Verych
2007-10-09 16:54         ` Joerg Roedel
2007-10-09 20:46         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-10  1:58           ` Oleg Verych
2007-10-09 17:33       ` coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change) Oleg Verych
2007-10-09 18:30         ` Joerg Roedel
2007-10-10 23:14           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-11 15:26             ` Oleg Verych
2007-10-11 15:21               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-11 16:13                 ` Oleg Verych
2007-10-09 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: mce cleanup part2: conding style cleanups Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1IfHZg-0003dp-FA@flower \
    --to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
    --cc=Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox