From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755524Ab0JEAgq (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:36:46 -0400 Received: from jdl.com ([208.123.74.7]:47658 "EHLO jdl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754112Ab0JEAgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:36:45 -0400 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt cc: Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Globally s/struct irq_host/struct irq_domain/ In-reply-to: <1286233776.2463.329.camel@pasglop> References: <20101004165212.GC13749@angua.secretlab.ca> <1286233776.2463.329.camel@pasglop> Comments: In-reply-to Benjamin Herrenschmidt message dated "Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:09:36 +1100." Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:36:40 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I doubt the need for irq_host will disappear. However I don't see that > going into the core under that name, so I think the rename is a very > valid thing to do now. We just need to sync the patches to avoid pure > mechanical clash. I'm happy to spin/rebase the patch as needed. > Thomas initial series doesn't yet generalize the virq layer and that > will take a bit longer, so I'm happy to see Jon stuff go upstream first. My patch is against Linus' mainline. Not sure who might pick it up. jdl