public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: simplify _regulator_get()" to the regulator tree
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:34:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1cbX4X-00011x-51@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170203215604.23285-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

The patch

   regulator: core: simplify _regulator_get()

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From a4d7641fa797b523c0789d2fa55b0a3d53abc2fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:56:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: simplify _regulator_get()

The code in _regulator_get() got a bit confusing over time, with control
flow jumping to a label from couple of places. Let's untangle it a bit by
doing the following:

1. Make handling of missing supplies and substituting them with dummy
regulators more explicit:

- check if we not have full constraints and refuse considering dummy
  regulators with appropriate message;

- use "switch (get_type)" to handle different types of request explicitly
  as well. "Normal" requests will get dummies, exclusive will not and
  will notify user about that; optional will fail silently.

2. Stop jumping to a label in the middle of the function but instead have
proper conditional flow. I believe jumps should be reserved for error
handling, breaking from inner loop, or restarting a loop, but not for
implementing normal conditional flow.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 3e246c82939d..a62f5b725061 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id,
 {
 	struct regulator_dev *rdev;
 	struct regulator *regulator;
-	const char *devname = NULL;
+	const char *devname = dev ? dev_name(dev) : "deviceless";
 	int ret;
 
 	if (get_type >= MAX_GET_TYPE) {
@@ -1601,45 +1601,47 @@ struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id,
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	if (dev)
-		devname = dev_name(dev);
-
 	rdev = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, id);
-	if (!IS_ERR(rdev))
-		goto found;
+	if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(rdev);
 
-	ret = PTR_ERR(rdev);
-	regulator = ERR_PTR(ret);
+		/*
+		 * If regulator_dev_lookup() fails with error other
+		 * than -ENODEV our job here is done, we simply return it.
+		 */
+		if (ret != -ENODEV)
+			return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
-	/*
-	 * If we have return value from dev_lookup fail, we do not expect to
-	 * succeed, so, quit with appropriate error value
-	 */
-	if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
-		return regulator;
+		if (!have_full_constraints()) {
+			dev_warn(dev,
+				 "incomplete constraints, dummy supplies not allowed\n");
+			return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+		}
 
-	if (!devname)
-		devname = "deviceless";
+		switch (get_type) {
+		case NORMAL_GET:
+			/*
+			 * Assume that a regulator is physically present and
+			 * enabled, even if it isn't hooked up, and just
+			 * provide a dummy.
+			 */
+			dev_warn(dev,
+				 "%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n",
+				 devname, id);
+			rdev = dummy_regulator_rdev;
+			get_device(&rdev->dev);
+			break;
 
-	/*
-	 * Assume that a regulator is physically present and enabled
-	 * even if it isn't hooked up and just provide a dummy.
-	 */
-	if (have_full_constraints() && get_type == NORMAL_GET) {
-		pr_warn("%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n",
-			devname, id);
+		case EXCLUSIVE_GET:
+			dev_warn(dev,
+				 "dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests\n");
+			/* fall through */
 
-		rdev = dummy_regulator_rdev;
-		get_device(&rdev->dev);
-		goto found;
-	/* Don't log an error when called from regulator_get_optional() */
-	} else if (!have_full_constraints() || get_type == EXCLUSIVE_GET) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "dummy supplies not allowed\n");
+		default:
+			return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+		}
 	}
 
-	return regulator;
-
-found:
 	if (rdev->exclusive) {
 		regulator = ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 		put_device(&rdev->dev);
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-08 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-03 21:56 [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: remove dead code in _regulator_get() Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: core: have regulator_dev_lookup() return ERR_PTR-encoded errors Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-04 10:11   ` Mark Brown
2017-02-04 18:19     ` [PATCH v2 " Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-05 14:49       ` Mark Brown
2017-02-05 23:49       ` Mark Brown
2017-02-06 13:37       ` Applied "regulator: core: have regulator_dev_lookup() return ERR_PTR-encoded errors" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2017-02-03 21:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: core: have _regulator_get() accept get_type argument Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-04 10:48   ` Applied "regulator: core: have _regulator_get() accept get_type argument" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2017-02-03 21:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: core: simplify _regulator_get() Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-04 10:34   ` Mark Brown
2017-02-04 18:27     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-05 16:08       ` Mark Brown
2017-02-08 18:34   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2017-02-03 21:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: core: lower severity level of message about using dummy supplies Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-04 11:48   ` Mark Brown
2017-02-04 17:45     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-05 16:12       ` Mark Brown
2017-02-07  0:56         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-08 18:19           ` Mark Brown
2017-02-04 10:48 ` Applied "regulator: core: remove dead code in _regulator_get()" to the regulator tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1cbX4X-00011x-51@debutante \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox