The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: warren.xiong <warren.xiong@ugreen.com>
To: david <david@kernel.org>,  akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: ljs <ljs@kernel.org>,  liam <liam@infradead.org>,
	 vbabka <vbabka@kernel.org>,  rppt <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 surenb <surenb@google.com>,  mhocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: read memory information without popen
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 20:07:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F297CB3DADE37E96+202608042007461850804@ugreen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9dc3b457-65aa-40ba-99a1-7c703facbd32@kernel.org




--------------



warren.xiong



>On 8/3/26 03:30, Warren Xiong wrote:



>> read_memory_info() invokes two shell pipelines to obtain MemFree and



>> Hugepagesize from /proc/meminfo. It does not check whether popen()



>> returns NULL before passing the result to fgets(), and it does not call



>> pclose() when fgets() fails.



>> 



>> Open /proc/meminfo directly and obtain both values in a single pass.



>> This removes the unchecked NULL path, closes the file on all paths, and



>> avoids dependencies on external commands.



>> 



>> The compaction test continues to pass after this change.



>> 



>> Signed-off-by: Warren Xiong <warren.xiong@ugreen.com>



>> ---



>>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-----------



>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)



>> 



>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>> index 5b58258..0df2000 100644



>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@



>>   * allocated.



>>   */



>>  



>> +#include <stdbool.h>



>>  #include <stdio.h>



>>  #include <stdlib.h>



>>  #include <sys/mman.h>



>> @@ -29,30 +30,40 @@ struct map_list {



>>  



>>  int read_memory_info(unsigned long *memfree, unsigned long *hugepagesize)



>>  {



>



>Looks much better indeed.



>



>> -	char  buffer[256] = {0};



>> -	char *cmd = "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i memfree | grep -o '[0-9]*'";



>> -	FILE *cmdfile = popen(cmd, "r");



>> +	char buffer[256];



>> +	bool memfree_found = false;



>> +	bool hugepagesize_found = false;



>> +	FILE *file;



>> +	int ret = -1;



>>  



>> -	if (!(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), cmdfile))) {



>> -		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read meminfo: %s\n", strerror(errno));



>> +	file = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");



>> +	if (!file) {



>> +		ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/meminfo: %s\n",



>> +			       strerror(errno));



>>  		return -1;



>>  	}



>>  



>> -	pclose(cmdfile);



>> +	while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file)) {



>> +		if (sscanf(buffer, "MemFree: %lu kB", memfree) == 1)



>> +			memfree_found = true;



>> +		else if (sscanf(buffer, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB",



>> +				hugepagesize) == 1)



>> +			hugepagesize_found = true;



>Instead of these bools you could just have a hit-count.

Thanks for the review.

Agreed, a hit count is sufficient here and makes the code simpler.  I
have incorporated this change and will send v2 shortly.

Thanks,
Warren



>



>Like the following on top:



>



>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>index 0df2000f4a2b1..30d4ace7155ae 100644



>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c



>@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@



>  * allocated.



>  */



>



>-#include <stdbool.h>



> #include <stdio.h>



> #include <stdlib.h>



> #include <sys/mman.h>



>@@ -31,8 +30,7 @@ struct map_list {



> int read_memory_info(unsigned long *memfree, unsigned long *hugepagesize)



> {



>        char buffer[256];



>-       bool memfree_found = false;



>-       bool hugepagesize_found = false;



>+       int found = 0;



>        FILE *file;



>        int ret = -1;



>



>@@ -43,24 +41,19 @@ int read_memory_info(unsigned long *memfree, unsigned long *hugepagesize)



>                return -1;



>        }



>



>-       while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file)) {



>-               if (sscanf(buffer, "MemFree: %lu kB", memfree) == 1)



>-                       memfree_found = true;



>-               else if (sscanf(buffer, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB",



>-                               hugepagesize) == 1)



>-                       hugepagesize_found = true;



>-



>-               if (memfree_found && hugepagesize_found) {



>-                       ret = 0;



>-                       break;



>-               }



>+       while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file) && found != 2) {



>+               if (sscanf(buffer, "MemFree: %lu kB", memfree) == 1 ||



>+                   sscanf(buffer, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB", hugepagesize) == 1)



>+                       found++;



>        }



>



>        if (ferror(file))



>                ksft_print_msg("Failed to read /proc/meminfo: %s\n",



>                               strerror(errno));



>-       else if (ret)



>+       else if (found != 2)



>                ksft_print_msg("Failed to parse /proc/meminfo\n");



>+       else



>+               ret = 0;



>



>        fclose(file);



>        return ret;



>



>



>-- 



>Cheers,



>



>David



>



  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03  1:30 [PATCH] selftests/mm: read memory information without popen Warren Xiong
2026-08-04  9:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-04 11:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-04 12:07   ` warren.xiong [this message]
2026-08-04 12:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Warren Xiong
2026-08-04 12:21   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F297CB3DADE37E96+202608042007461850804@ugreen.com \
    --to=warren.xiong@ugreen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox