* [PATCH v2 iwl-next 0/2] igbvf: ethtool statistics improvements @ 2025-08-18 15:18 Kohei Enju 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-18 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju, Kohei Enju This series contains: 1. Add missing lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes counters that are available in hardware but not exposed via ethtool 2. Remove rx_long_byte_count counter that shows the same value as rx_bytes Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. Changes: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20250813075206.70114-1-enjuk@amazon.com/ v2: - Remove Tested-by: tag - Add Reviewed-by: tag - s/duplicated/redundant/ in commit message of the 2/2 patch Kohei Enju (2): igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from ethtool statistics drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.48.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 [PATCH v2 iwl-next 0/2] igbvf: ethtool statistics improvements Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-18 15:18 ` Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 12:27 ` Simon Horman 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju 1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-18 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju, Kohei Enju, Paul Menzel Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side equivalents (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those missing statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics. In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not consistent with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). Therefore, align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets. Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. Before: # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" rx_packets: 135 tx_packets: 106 rx_bytes: 16010 tx_bytes: 12451 lbrx_bytes: 1148 lbrx_packets: 12 After: # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" rx_packets: 748 tx_packets: 304 rx_bytes: 81513 tx_bytes: 33698 lbrx_packets: 97 lbtx_packets: 109 lbrx_bytes: 12090 lbtx_bytes: 12401 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c index 773895c663fd..c6defc495f13 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = { { "rx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) }, { "tx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotc, stats.base_gotc) }, { "multicast", IGBVF_STAT(stats.mprc, stats.base_mprc) }, - { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) }, { "lbrx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gprlbc, stats.base_gprlbc) }, + { "lbtx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gptlbc, stats.base_gptlbc) }, + { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) }, + { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) }, { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) }, { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) }, { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) }, -- 2.48.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-19 8:17 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 12:27 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2025-08-19 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kohei Enju, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju@gmail.com, Paul Menzel > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf > Of Kohei Enju > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 5:18 PM > To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, > Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Andrew Lunn > <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric > Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo > Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; kohei.enju@gmail.com; Kohei Enju > <enjuk@amazon.com>; Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add > lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics > > Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX > Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side > equivalents (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those > missing statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics. > > In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not > consistent with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). > Therefore, align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and > lbrx_packets. > > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. > > Before: > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > rx_packets: 135 > tx_packets: 106 > rx_bytes: 16010 > tx_bytes: 12451 > lbrx_bytes: 1148 > lbrx_packets: 12 > > After: > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > rx_packets: 748 > tx_packets: 304 > rx_bytes: 81513 > tx_bytes: 33698 > lbrx_packets: 97 > lbtx_packets: 109 > lbrx_bytes: 12090 > lbtx_bytes: 12401 > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > index 773895c663fd..c6defc495f13 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats > igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = { > { "rx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) }, > { "tx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotc, stats.base_gotc) }, > { "multicast", IGBVF_STAT(stats.mprc, stats.base_mprc) }, > - { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) }, > { "lbrx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gprlbc, stats.base_gprlbc) > }, > + { "lbtx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gptlbc, stats.base_gptlbc) > }, > + { "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) }, > + { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) }, > { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) }, > { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) > }, > { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) > }, > -- > 2.48.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2025-08-27 12:27 ` Simon Horman 2025-08-28 10:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2025-08-27 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kohei Enju Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju, Paul Menzel On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:18:26AM +0900, Kohei Enju wrote: > Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX > Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side equivalents > (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those missing > statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics. > > In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not consistent > with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). Therefore, > align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets. > > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. > > Before: > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > rx_packets: 135 > tx_packets: 106 > rx_bytes: 16010 > tx_bytes: 12451 > lbrx_bytes: 1148 > lbrx_packets: 12 > > After: > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > rx_packets: 748 > tx_packets: 304 > rx_bytes: 81513 > tx_bytes: 33698 > lbrx_packets: 97 > lbtx_packets: 109 > lbrx_bytes: 12090 > lbtx_bytes: 12401 > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics 2025-08-27 12:27 ` Simon Horman @ 2025-08-28 10:12 ` Romanowski, Rafal 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Romanowski, Rafal @ 2025-08-28 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman, Kohei Enju Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju@gmail.com, Paul Menzel > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Simon > Horman > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 2:27 PM > To: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> > Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Andrew Lunn > <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric > Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo > Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; kohei.enju@gmail.com; Paul Menzel > <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and > lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:18:26AM +0900, Kohei Enju wrote: > > Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX > > Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side > > equivalents (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those > > missing statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics. > > > > In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not > > consistent with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). > > Therefore, align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets. > > > > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. > > > > Before: > > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > > rx_packets: 135 > > tx_packets: 106 > > rx_bytes: 16010 > > tx_bytes: 12451 > > lbrx_bytes: 1148 > > lbrx_packets: 12 > > > > After: > > # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)" > > rx_packets: 748 > > tx_packets: 304 > > rx_bytes: 81513 > > tx_bytes: 33698 > > lbrx_packets: 97 > > lbtx_packets: 109 > > lbrx_bytes: 12090 > > lbtx_bytes: 12401 > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 [PATCH v2 iwl-next 0/2] igbvf: ethtool statistics improvements Kohei Enju 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-18 15:18 ` Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 13:49 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-18 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel Cc: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju, Kohei Enju, Paul Menzel rx_long_byte_count shows the value of the GORC (Good Octets Received Count) register. However, the register value is already shown as rx_bytes and they always show the same value. Remove rx_long_byte_count as the Intel ethernet driver e1000e did in commit 0a939912cf9c ("e1000e: cleanup redundant statistics counter"). Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c index c6defc495f13..9c08ebfad804 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = { { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) }, { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) }, { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) }, - { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) }, { "rx_csum_offload_good", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_good, zero_base) }, { "rx_csum_offload_errors", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_err, zero_base) }, { "rx_header_split", IGBVF_STAT(rx_hdr_split, zero_base) }, -- 2.48.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju @ 2025-08-19 8:19 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 13:49 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2025-08-19 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kohei Enju, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L, Kitszel, Przemyslaw, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju@gmail.com, Paul Menzel > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf > Of Kohei Enju > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 5:18 PM > To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, > Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Andrew Lunn > <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric > Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo > Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; kohei.enju@gmail.com; Kohei Enju > <enjuk@amazon.com>; Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove > redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from ethtool statistics > > rx_long_byte_count shows the value of the GORC (Good Octets Received > Count) register. However, the register value is already shown as > rx_bytes and they always show the same value. > > Remove rx_long_byte_count as the Intel ethernet driver e1000e did in > commit 0a939912cf9c ("e1000e: cleanup redundant statistics counter"). > > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > index c6defc495f13..9c08ebfad804 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats > igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = { > { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) }, > { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) }, > { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) > }, > - { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) > }, > { "rx_csum_offload_good", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_good, zero_base) > }, > { "rx_csum_offload_errors", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_err, zero_base) > }, > { "rx_header_split", IGBVF_STAT(rx_hdr_split, zero_base) }, > -- > 2.48.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from ethtool statistics 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2025-08-27 13:49 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2025-08-27 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kohei Enju Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel, Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kohei.enju, Paul Menzel On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:18:27AM +0900, Kohei Enju wrote: > rx_long_byte_count shows the value of the GORC (Good Octets Received > Count) register. However, the register value is already shown as > rx_bytes and they always show the same value. > > Remove rx_long_byte_count as the Intel ethernet driver e1000e did in > commit 0a939912cf9c ("e1000e: cleanup redundant statistics counter"). > > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection. > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-28 10:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-08-18 15:18 [PATCH v2 iwl-next 0/2] igbvf: ethtool statistics improvements Kohei Enju 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 12:27 ` Simon Horman 2025-08-28 10:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal 2025-08-18 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 iwl-next 2/2] igbvf: remove redundant counter rx_long_byte_count from " Kohei Enju 2025-08-19 8:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr 2025-08-27 13:49 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).