From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750728AbWGPSDZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:03:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750752AbWGPSDZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:03:25 -0400 Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com ([192.195.190.1]:39320 "EHLO intrepid.intrepid.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbWGPSDY (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:03:24 -0400 From: "Gary Funck" To: Cc: "Yuri van Oers" Subject: RE: SCSI device order changed Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:03:30 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060716171547.W18821-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yuri van Oers wrote: > I found a related post here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/3/192 > which suggests this situation arose around 2.6.15. It also says ordering > can't be guaranteed. If that's the final verdict, I'll simply swap the > cards on the PCI bus and be done with it. > We saw this change in behavior also. Labeling the root volume, and mounting via label may help to keep things more portable, however, I recall that labels and the device manager managed devices interacted in some way that made mounting / via a label more difficult, however.