public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tamas Nagy" <nagytam@rerecognition.com>
To: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Idea: Encryption plugin architecture for file-systems
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:52:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <NFBBIDPOFIIFCBDDFGLEGEMICCAA.nagytam@rerecognition.com> (raw)

Hello,

Lot of people would like to know their data in secure place, and the
frequent usage of compression softwares could be time-consuming and boring
sometime.

Idea:
extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
for file-system level encryption instead of file-level. This could be used
transparently for applications or even for file-system drivers.  This
doesn't mean an encrypted file-system, but a transparent encryption of a
media instead.

Advantages:
#1: optional security level for every data, without user interaction.
#2: if this idea is used e.g. for portable media (like cdrom), your backup
could be in safe also.
#3: (almost;)) everybody could create own security plugin for their data,
and not have to trust on the designers of a secure file systems.

I suspect that this idea may appeared in the past:(, but I haven't heard
about it;).

So, what do you think about this? Is Linux kernel enough flexible to do
this? What changes are necessary to do such a thing? Is there any other way,
to have own security for file-systems or portable medias? Is this
implementation could be used in the US?

Best regards,
Tamas Nagy





             reply	other threads:[~2001-04-21 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-21 18:52 Tamas Nagy [this message]
2001-04-21 19:10 ` Idea: Encryption plugin architecture for file-systems Ian Stirling
2001-04-21 19:11 ` Alistair Riddell
2001-04-21 19:13 ` Bart Trojanowski
2001-04-21 19:21 ` Peter Makholm
2001-04-21 19:37   ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-21 20:26     ` Herbert Valerio Riedel
2001-04-21 22:50     ` Dan Hollis
2001-04-21 22:49   ` Dan Hollis
2001-04-22  9:42     ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-21 19:40 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-23 20:12   ` Dale Amon
2001-04-24  2:54     ` David L. Nicol
2001-04-24 16:08       ` Dale Amon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=NFBBIDPOFIIFCBDDFGLEGEMICCAA.nagytam@rerecognition.com \
    --to=nagytam@rerecognition.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox