From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:11:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:11:13 -0400 Received: from shell.ca.us.webchat.org ([216.152.64.152]:27829 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:11:01 -0400 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Lew Wolfgang" , "Pavel Machek" Cc: "Jesse Pollard" , , Subject: RE: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself. Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:10:58 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If the > CD key is used again they just refuse to send the final key. Do you have any evidence to support this statement or is it an assumption? This is almost never the way such schemes are implemented. The policy is to send the final key unless there's clear evidence of abuse (such as the CD key being found on a web site or being reinstalled dozens of times from all over the planet). DS