From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932495AbVHIEqX@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932495AbVHIEqX (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:46:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750929AbVHIEqX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:46:23 -0400
Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.30]:26335 "EHLO
	mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750986AbVHIEqX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:46:23 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
X-X-Sender: jmorris@excalibur.intercode
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
cc: David Wagner <daw-usenet@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: understanding Linux capabilities brokenness
In-Reply-To: <20050809015048.GA14204@thunk.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508090044400.20178@excalibur.intercode>
References: <20050808211241.GA22446@clipper.ens.fr> <20050808223238.GA523@clipper.ens.fr>
 <dd8r9s$eqn$1@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <20050809015048.GA14204@thunk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Let me play the Devil's advocate here.

Should we be thinking about deprecating and removing capabilities from 
Linux?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>