From: William Heimbigner <icxcnika@mar.tar.cc>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about Reiser4
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:56:00 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704230353000.25153@server.thyself> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462C2E5B.1080008@redhat.com>
> Eric Hopper wrote:
>> I know that this whole effort has been put in disarray by the
>> prosecution of Hans Reiser, but I'm curious as to its status.
>
> It was in disarray well before. Many of the reiser4 features,
> like filesystem plugins, make more technical sense in the Linux
> VFS, but made more business sense for Namesys as a reiserfs 4
> thing. That lead to a stalemate.
>
Shouldn't it be a matter of stability though? Benchmarks suggest that
reiser4 is a good file system; reiser4 is the successor to the
already-accepted reiserfs; we've got experimental ext4 support but no
reiser4 support, etc.
I don't see why something like plugins should matter. If it works enough
to be marked as experimental, why shouldn't reiser4 support be included?
It's a pain for me personally to have to patch any kernel with reiser4
support so I can use the reiser4 fs.
William Heimbigner
icxcnika@mar.tar.cc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-23 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 2:00 Question about Reiser4 Eric Hopper
2007-04-23 2:31 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-23 3:56 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 3:56 ` William Heimbigner [this message]
2007-04-23 5:47 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 5:57 ` William Heimbigner
2007-04-23 6:07 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 6:14 ` William Heimbigner
2007-04-23 6:20 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 6:42 ` William Heimbigner
2007-04-23 8:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 11:31 ` l.genoni
2007-04-23 13:52 ` Eric Hopper
2007-04-23 17:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 18:36 ` Miguel Ojeda
2007-04-23 19:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-23 22:56 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-23 23:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-24 0:14 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 0:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-24 13:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-24 0:19 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-24 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-24 1:17 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-24 11:15 ` Denis Vlasenko
2007-04-25 6:39 ` Eric M. Hopper
2007-04-25 14:45 ` lkml777
2007-04-23 6:14 ` Jeff Chua
[not found] <20070423111939.c876c9cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-24 14:43 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-04-24 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-25 14:35 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-04-25 14:49 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-25 15:06 ` lkml777
2007-04-25 15:50 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-26 5:05 ` lkml777
2007-04-26 6:49 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-26 5:09 ` lkml777
2007-04-26 6:48 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-26 8:18 ` Jeff Chua
2007-04-27 7:16 ` lkml777
2007-04-26 0:44 ` lkml777
2007-04-25 0:12 ` lkml777
2007-04-25 6:26 ` Eric M. Hopper
2007-04-25 15:03 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-04-26 7:47 ` lkml777
2007-04-26 7:54 ` lkml777
2007-05-02 2:39 ` lkml777
2007-05-02 4:53 ` lkml777
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704230353000.25153@server.thyself \
--to=icxcnika@mar.tar.cc \
--cc=hopper@omnifarious.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox