Re: A bit of kconfig rewrite (Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL)

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> > > > > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me.
> > > > 
> > > > There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today.
> > > 
> > > Who wants to meet a zombie anyway?
> > 
> > Finding quotes from old threads does not in any way prove your point.
> 
> This makes air hot for Roman. I want to prove my point not by words. But
> have to reply with something on my side, until i have work done.
> 
> []
> > And until now you have not given one single example of real
> > problems that will be solved by a total rewrite and cannot
> > be solved otherwise.
> 
> If you didn't see them in that, what i've posted, then i just have to
> say: i don't need to give anything. There are kvm, lguest, xen with ext2,
> ext3, xfs, etc. And there's no working alternative to build/config
> system. Thus, let me have my try OK? Thanks!

<ironic>
Let's add an alternative to the Makefiles, too....
</ironic>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds