From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [3/10 PATCH] inline wake_up_bit
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:36:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806251031330.7542@engineering.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806251617.40871.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 07:57, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>> Inline wake_up_bit. The function just pases arguments around.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>>
>> int __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *, struct wait_bit_queue *, int (*)(void *), unsigned);
>> -void wake_up_bit(void *, int);
>> int out_of_line_wait_on_bit(void *, int, int (*)(void *), unsigned);
>
>> +static __always_inline void wake_up_bit(void *word, int bit)
>> +{
>> + __wake_up_bit(bit_waitqueue(word, bit), word, bit);
>> +}
>
> So now every call to wake_up_bit(word, bit) now is converted to:
>
> __wake_up_bit(bit_waitqueue(word, bit), word, bit);
>
> which is in turn converted to (looking into your next patch):
>
> {
> wait_queue_head_t *wq = bit_waitqueue(word, bit);
> struct wait_bit_key key = __WAIT_BIT_KEY_INITIALIZER(word, bit);
> if (waitqueue_active(wq))
> __wake_up(wq, TASK_NORMAL, 1, &key);
> }
>
> which is in turn converted to (looking into your other patch):
>
> {
> wait_queue_head_t *wq = bit_waitqueue(word, bit);
> struct wait_bit_key key = __WAIT_BIT_KEY_INITIALIZER(word, bit);
> if (waitqueue_active(wq))
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&qw->lock, flags);
> __wake_up_common(wq, TASK_NORMAL, 1, 0, &key);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq->lock, flags);
> }
> }
>
> And you know what? This is likely not the end yet! It's possible
> spin_lock_irqXXX, __wake_up_common, waitqueue_active or bit_waitqueue
> are inlines - I didn't check.
> --
> vda
Yes, that's 0.2% code size increase (or none increase, if drop
inline-__wake_up_bit.patch and apply only the other patches). To me it
seems crazy, how this code was refactored again and again over time, up to
8 levels of functions (including passing a pointer to a method). In 2.0.x
kernel series, it was just a single call to wake up a queue.
Mikulas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-25 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 5:54 [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:55 ` [1/10 PATCH] inline __queue_work Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:56 ` [2/10 PATCH] inline inline-generic_writepages.patch Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:57 ` [3/10 PATCH] inline wake_up_bit Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-25 14:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-06-25 14:36 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2008-06-25 15:24 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-06-25 16:01 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-25 20:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-06-26 0:28 ` David Miller
2008-06-26 3:35 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-06-26 4:18 ` David Miller
2008-06-26 18:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-25 22:23 ` David Miller
2008-06-25 22:30 ` David Miller
2008-06-24 5:57 ` [4/10 PATCH] inline __wake_up_bit Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:58 ` [5/10 PATCH] inline __wake_up Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:59 ` [6/10 PATCH] inline default_wake_function Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 5:59 ` [6/10 PATCH] inline autoremove_wake_function Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 6:01 ` [8/10 PATCH] inline filemap_fdatawrite Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 6:01 ` [9/10 PATCH] inline dm-kcopyd-inline-wake.patch Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 6:03 ` [10/10 PATCH] inline dispatch_job Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 6:06 ` [PATCH] limit irq nesting Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-24 7:01 ` [10 PATCHES] inline functions to avoid stack overflow Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <486216E7.8000002@aitel.hist.no>
2008-06-25 12:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-25 22:09 ` David Miller
2008-06-26 6:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-06-26 9:06 ` David Miller
2008-07-02 4:39 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-02 4:45 ` David Miller
2008-07-03 21:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0806251031330.7542@engineering.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox