From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:23:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809061422510.4138@anakin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080831161016.GE3695@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes the no longer used m68k PCI code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
>
> --- a/include/asm-m68k/pci.h
> +++ b/include/asm-m68k/pci.h
> -/* The PCI address space does equal the physical memory
> - * address space. The networking and block device layers use
> - * this boolean for bounce buffer decisions.
> - */
I'd like to keep this comment, as the #define is still there.
Is that OK for you?
> #define PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS (1)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-06 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 13:47 [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2008-08-19 14:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-19 14:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-19 15:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-22 3:44 ` Bryan Wu
2008-08-25 6:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-25 20:43 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI code Adrian Bunk
2008-08-29 4:13 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-29 7:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-29 7:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-31 16:10 ` [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code Adrian Bunk
2008-09-03 7:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-06 12:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2008-09-09 5:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-09-09 7:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-25 13:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-29 11:07 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI code Greg Ungerer
2008-08-31 16:10 ` [2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the eLIA support Adrian Bunk
2008-08-31 16:10 ` [2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the unused PCI option Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0809061422510.4138@anakin \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox