From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760061AbZCCWFr (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:05:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758234AbZCCWAd (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:00:33 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:39372 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758210AbZCCWAa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:00:30 -0500 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Matthew A. Bockol" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:25:56 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763 Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4