public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joeja@mindspring.com
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Alex Deucher <adeucher@UU.NET>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:06:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Springmail.105.993672371.0.48374000@www.springmail.com> (raw)

Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).  

I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it may be a kt7a thing. 

Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware thing.  I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded.. 

is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 6pci, agp, 512MEG+ RAM?

Joe 

Dave Jones <davej@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
> actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
> some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
> optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
systems, to see if this is the case.

Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
are not available.

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs



             reply	other threads:[~2001-06-27 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-27 20:06 joeja [this message]
2001-06-27 20:53 ` Re: AMD thunderbird oops Luigi Genoni
2001-06-28 20:33 ` Tim Moore
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-25 16:24 joeja
2001-06-25 16:28 ` Luigi Genoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Springmail.105.993672371.0.48374000@www.springmail.com \
    --to=joeja@mindspring.com \
    --cc=adeucher@UU.NET \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox