Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit

Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-29T04:56:40Z

At 2:04 PM -0400 2001-04-28, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>It is a disaster waiting to happen. Instead of having the offending
>process get killed, your machine could suffer extreme thrashing.
>
>Have enough swap for idle processes and no more.

Let's altogether now say "working set".

(Does Linux swap out text, by the way, he asks ignorantly?)
--
/Jonathan Lundell.