From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:03:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:02:51 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:29377 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:02:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 02:01:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Message-Id: To: torvalds@transmeta.com, viro@math.psu.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Do we really want a separate queue for each partition? No. > I have a half-baked patch Me too. (Not half-baked but brewed.) In principle the change is trivial, but there are a few IDE issues that are presently solved in a very low-level way (and incorrectly). This makes the patch larger than expected at first sight. Andries