From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:48:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:48:14 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:32234 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:48:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:47:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@math.psu.edu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 May 2001 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > > why not implement partitions as simply doing block remaps > > Everybody agrees. No they don't. We had this discussion already. We all agree. Maybe you read in "remap" something other than a simple addition but I don't. This is not a topic where further discussion is needed. Andries