From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:02:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:02:02 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:27330 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:01:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:01:20 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, viro@math.psu.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Cc: helgehaf@idb.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Besides, just on general principles, we'd better have clean interface > for changing partitioning It is not quite clear to me what you are arguing for or against. But never mind - I'll leave few hours from now. When the time is there I'll show you an implementation, and if you don't like it, you'll show me a better one. Andries