From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, p_gortmaker@yahoo.com
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, andre@linux-ide.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clipped disk reports clipped lba size
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:55:54 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <UTC200202012155.VAA123193.aeb@cwi.nl> (raw)
From: Paul Gortmaker <p_gortmaker@yahoo.com>
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> Some disk types fake LBA at 33.8GB, but allow access past this point.
> Some disks actually give I/O errors past the 33.8GB (when jumpered),
> and a SETMAX command is needed to make the rest accessible.
>
> Two years ago I wrote a tiny utility setmax that does this.
> If I am not mistaken this stuff is now part of the 2.5 kernel.
> No doubt some of it will eventually be backported to 2.4 / 2.2 / 2.0.
> It is in 2.4.18-pre7-ac1.
Alan has said (quite reasonably) that he is not interested in inclusion
of the big IDE patch that exists for 2.2.x -- however, a minimal cut and
paste backport from 2.4.x IDE to just support HDIO_DRIVE_CMD_AEB (and thus
support setmax) is only about a 100 line diff which I did a while ago.
If there is any interest in this I can check it still applies cleanly to
current 2.2 pre kernel and send it along for inclusion.
(1) *_AEB is intended as private namespace for me, not for inclusion
in an official kernel. So, some official name, like HDIO_DRIVE_TASK,
must be better.
(2) Long ago very little information was available and I wrote a small
program that worked for me and solicited experiences from others.
By now we have a better idea of the variations that exist.
Moreover, this is beginning 2.5 time, so experiments are allowed.
That means that we can delete CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE, and make the
kernel do what we think is right. Once this gets to a state where
there are no complaints anymore we can move it to some 2.4 tree,
and if that still does not produce complaints to 2.2 and 2.0.
In the area of big disks there are two main hurdles these days:
(a) capacity-limiting jumpers to overcome BIOS problems
(b) disks larger than 137 GB, the old ATA limit.
Both problems can be solved with relatively small patches,
no big monolithic IDE patch required. And I would prefer
to solve both problems without involving ioctl's, or boot
parameters, or config parameters. All should just work
in the common case.
Andries
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-01 21:55 Andries.Brouwer [this message]
2002-02-02 0:20 ` [PATCH] clipped disk reports clipped lba size Andre Hedrick
2002-02-02 11:11 ` Paul Gortmaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-02 13:38 Andries.Brouwer
2002-01-30 20:12 Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-01 12:10 ` Paul Gortmaker
2002-01-30 15:02 Eduardo Trápani
2002-01-30 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-30 17:04 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=UTC200202012155.VAA123193.aeb@cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox