public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, balbir_soni@yahoo.com, jholly@cup.hp.com,
	plars@austin.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: readv() return and errno
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:15:44 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <UTC200203262115.VAA429771.aeb@cwi.nl> (raw)

    From jholly@cup.hp.com Tue Mar 26 18:13:40 2002

    Doesn't seem confusing at all.

    RETURN VALUE
           On  success  readv  returns  the number of bytes read.  On
           success writev returns the number of  bytes  written.   On
           error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.

    ERRORS
           EINVAL An  invalid  argument was given. For instance count
                  might be greater than MAX_IOVEC, or zero.  fd could
                  also  be  attached to an object  which  is  unsuit-
                  able  for  reading  (for  readv)  or  writing  (for
                  writev).

    I don't see much in the way of waffle words. If count is greater than
    MAX_IOVEC or zero you get EINVAL.

Yes, without hesitation you choose the wrong interpretation.
That is why I explained in so much detail what the right
interpretation is. Since you perhaps still do not understand,
let me reiterate:

The above ERRORS section says: In case this call returns EINVAL
one of the possible reasons is that an invalid argument was given.
There do exist Unix-like systems (not necessarily Linux) that
consider a zero count invalid.

Andries

             reply	other threads:[~2002-03-26 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-26 21:15 Andries.Brouwer [this message]
2002-03-26 23:40 ` readv() return and errno Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-26 21:37 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-26 23:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-26 17:13 Jim Hollenback
2002-03-26 18:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-26 16:19 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-26 17:01 ` Balbir Singh
2002-03-15 23:15 Balbir Singh
2002-03-15 21:54 Jim Hollenback
2002-03-19 13:27 ` Alex Riesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=UTC200203262115.VAA429771.aeb@cwi.nl \
    --to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=balbir_soni@yahoo.com \
    --cc=jholly@cup.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plars@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox