* need help
@ 2002-06-08 11:27 manjuanth n
2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-08 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: manju_tt
Dear sir,
we have SAN environment with hitachi storage box
and brocade switch. we are trying to install Linux
with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
problems
1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to see
any LUNs on liunx machine
2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the LUNS
but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3 etc
if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see LUNS
4 and the rest
Is the above things are limitation of linux.
Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
Is there any solutions for these problems?
Thanks and Regards
Manjuanth
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2002-06-08 11:27 manjuanth n
@ 2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Clark @ 2002-06-08 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: manjuanth n; +Cc: linux-kernel
2.4.18 needs a hint added to drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model and
add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
...
{"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is correct
will force scanning of all luns.
I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
which kernel has it.
~mc
On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
>Dear sir,
> we have SAN environment with hitachi storage box
>and brocade switch. we are trying to install Linux
>with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
>problems
>1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to see
>any LUNs on liunx machine
>2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the LUNS
>but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3 etc
>if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see LUNS
>4 and the rest
> Is the above things are limitation of linux.
>Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
>
>Is there any solutions for these problems?
>
>Thanks and Regards
>Manjuanth
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
@ 2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-10 17:04 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Clark; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3446 bytes --]
Dear Michael,
Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
remains unresolved. I added the following lines to
scsi_scan.c and recompiled
{"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN |
BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.0
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 01
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 01
Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
If u can help me out where i am doing the mistake
it will be of great help.
plfind the enclosed scsi_scan.c file. Is there any
method or commands to find out BLIST_FORCELUN is
enabled?
Thanks and regards
Manjunath
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> 2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
>
> Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model and
> add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
>
> ...
> {"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
>
> If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is correct
> will force scanning of all luns.
>
> I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> which kernel has it.
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear sir,
> > we have SAN environment with hitachi storage box
> >and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> Linux
> >with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >problems
> >1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> see
> >any LUNs on liunx machine
> >2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the LUNS
> >but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
> etc
> >if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> LUNS
> >4 and the rest
> > Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >
> >Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >
> >Thanks and Regards
> >Manjuanth
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
[-- Attachment #2: scsi_scan.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 27474 bytes --]
/*
* scsi_scan.c Copyright (C) 2000 Eric Youngdale
*
* Bus scan logic.
*
* This used to live in scsi.c, but that file was just a laundry basket
* full of misc stuff. This got separated out in order to make things
* clearer.
*/
#define __NO_VERSION__
#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/blk.h>
#include "scsi.h"
#include "hosts.h"
#include "constants.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_KMOD
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#endif
/* The following devices are known not to tolerate a lun != 0 scan for
* one reason or another. Some will respond to all luns, others will
* lock up.
*/
#define BLIST_NOLUN 0x001
#define BLIST_FORCELUN 0x002
#define BLIST_BORKEN 0x004
#define BLIST_KEY 0x008
#define BLIST_SINGLELUN 0x010
#define BLIST_NOTQ 0x020
#define BLIST_SPARSELUN 0x040
#define BLIST_MAX5LUN 0x080
#define BLIST_ISDISK 0x100
#define BLIST_ISROM 0x200
static void print_inquiry(unsigned char *data);
static int scan_scsis_single(unsigned int channel, unsigned int dev,
unsigned int lun, int lun0_scsi_level,
unsigned int *max_scsi_dev, unsigned int *sparse_lun,
Scsi_Device ** SDpnt, struct Scsi_Host *shpnt,
char *scsi_result);
static int find_lun0_scsi_level(unsigned int channel, unsigned int dev,
struct Scsi_Host *shpnt);
struct dev_info {
const char *vendor;
const char *model;
const char *revision; /* Latest revision known to be bad. Not used yet */
unsigned flags;
};
/*
* This is what was previously known as the blacklist. The concept
* has been expanded so that we can specify other types of things we
* need to be aware of.
*/
static struct dev_info device_list[] =
{
{"Aashima", "IMAGERY 2400SP", "1.03", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"CHINON", "CD-ROM CDS-431", "H42", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"CHINON", "CD-ROM CDS-535", "Q14", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"DENON", "DRD-25X", "V", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if probed for lun != 0 */
{"HITACHI", "DK312C", "CM81", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Responds to all lun - dtg */
{"HITACHI", "DK314C", "CR21", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* responds to all lun */
{"IMS", "CDD521/10", "2.06", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks-up when LUN>0 polled. */
{"MAXTOR", "XT-3280", "PR02", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks-up when LUN>0 polled. */
{"MAXTOR", "XT-4380S", "B3C", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks-up when LUN>0 polled. */
{"MAXTOR", "MXT-1240S", "I1.2", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up when LUN>0 polled */
{"MAXTOR", "XT-4170S", "B5A", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks-up sometimes when LUN>0 polled. */
{"MAXTOR", "XT-8760S", "B7B", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* guess what? */
{"MEDIAVIS", "RENO CD-ROMX2A", "2.03", BLIST_NOLUN}, /*Responds to all lun */
{"MICROP", "4110", "*", BLIST_NOTQ}, /* Buggy Tagged Queuing */
{"NEC", "CD-ROM DRIVE:841", "1.0", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks-up when LUN>0 polled. */
{"PHILIPS", "PCA80SC", "V4-2", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Responds to all lun */
{"RODIME", "RO3000S", "2.33", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"SANYO", "CRD-250S", "1.20", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* causes failed REQUEST SENSE on lun 1
* for aha152x controller, which causes
* SCSI code to reset bus.*/
{"SEAGATE", "ST157N", "\004|j", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* causes failed REQUEST SENSE on lun 1
* for aha152x controller, which causes
* SCSI code to reset bus.*/
{"SEAGATE", "ST296", "921", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Responds to all lun */
{"SEAGATE", "ST1581", "6538", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Responds to all lun */
{"SONY", "CD-ROM CDU-541", "4.3d", BLIST_NOLUN},
{"SONY", "CD-ROM CDU-55S", "1.0i", BLIST_NOLUN},
{"SONY", "CD-ROM CDU-561", "1.7x", BLIST_NOLUN},
{"SONY", "CD-ROM CDU-8012", "*", BLIST_NOLUN},
{"TANDBERG", "TDC 3600", "U07", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"TEAC", "CD-R55S", "1.0H", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"TEAC", "CD-ROM", "1.06", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* causes failed REQUEST SENSE on lun 1
* for seagate controller, which causes
* SCSI code to reset bus.*/
{"TEAC", "MT-2ST/45S2-27", "RV M", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Responds to all lun */
{"TEXEL", "CD-ROM", "1.06", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* causes failed REQUEST SENSE on lun 1
* for seagate controller, which causes
* SCSI code to reset bus.*/
{"QUANTUM", "LPS525S", "3110", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks sometimes if polled for lun != 0 */
{"QUANTUM", "PD1225S", "3110", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks sometimes if polled for lun != 0 */
{"QUANTUM", "FIREBALL ST4.3S", "0F0C", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up when polled for lun != 0 */
{"MEDIAVIS", "CDR-H93MV", "1.31", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"SANKYO", "CP525", "6.64", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* causes failed REQ SENSE, extra reset */
{"HP", "C1750A", "3226", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* scanjet iic */
{"HP", "C1790A", "", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* scanjet iip */
{"HP", "C2500A", "", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* scanjet iicx */
{"YAMAHA", "CDR100", "1.00", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"YAMAHA", "CDR102", "1.00", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0
* extra reset */
{"YAMAHA", "CRW8424S", "1.0", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"YAMAHA", "CRW6416S", "1.0c", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"MITSUMI", "CD-R CR-2201CS", "6119", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* Locks up if polled for lun != 0 */
{"RELISYS", "Scorpio", "*", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* responds to all LUN */
{"MICROTEK", "ScanMaker II", "5.61", BLIST_NOLUN}, /* responds to all LUN */
/*
* Other types of devices that have special flags.
*/
{"SONY", "CD-ROM CDU-8001", "*", BLIST_BORKEN},
{"TEXEL", "CD-ROM", "1.06", BLIST_BORKEN},
{"IOMEGA", "Io20S *F", "*", BLIST_KEY},
{"INSITE", "Floptical F*8I", "*", BLIST_KEY},
{"INSITE", "I325VM", "*", BLIST_KEY},
{"LASOUND","CDX7405","3.10", BLIST_MAX5LUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"NRC", "MBR-7", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"NRC", "MBR-7.4", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"REGAL", "CDC-4X", "*", BLIST_MAX5LUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"NAKAMICH", "MJ-4.8S", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"NAKAMICH", "MJ-5.16S", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-602X", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-604X", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"EMULEX", "MD21/S2 ESDI", "*", BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"CANON", "IPUBJD", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"nCipher", "Fastness Crypto", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"DEC","HSG80","*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"COMPAQ","LOGICAL VOLUME","*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"COMPAQ","CR3500","*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"NEC", "PD-1 ODX654P", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"MATSHITA", "PD-1", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
{"iomega", "jaz 1GB", "J.86", BLIST_NOTQ | BLIST_NOLUN},
{"TOSHIBA","CDROM","*", BLIST_ISROM},
{"TOSHIBA","CD-ROM","*", BLIST_ISROM},
{"MegaRAID", "LD", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"DGC", "RAID", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Dell PV 650F (tgt @ LUN 0)
{"DGC", "DISK", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Dell PV 650F (no tgt @ LUN 0)
{"DELL", "PV660F", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"DELL", "PV660F PSEUDO", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"DELL", "PSEUDO DEVICE .", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Dell PV 530F
{"DELL", "PV530F", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Dell PV 530F
{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"CMD", "CRA-7280", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // CMD RAID Controller
{"CNSI", "G7324", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Chaparral G7324 RAID
{"CNSi", "G8324", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN}, // Chaparral G8324 RAID
{"Zzyzx", "RocketStor 500S", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"Zzyzx", "RocketStor 2000", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"SONY", "TSL", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN}, // DDS3 & DDS4 autoloaders
{"DELL", "PERCRAID", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HP", "NetRAID-4M", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"ADAPTEC", "AACRAID", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"ADAPTEC", "Adaptec 5400S", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"COMPAQ", "MSA1000", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
{"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
/*
* Must be at end of list...
*/
{NULL, NULL, NULL}
};
#define MAX_SCSI_LUNS 0xFFFFFFFF
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN
static unsigned int max_scsi_luns = MAX_SCSI_LUNS;
#else
static unsigned int max_scsi_luns = 1;
#endif
#ifdef MODULE
MODULE_PARM(max_scsi_luns, "i");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_scsi_luns, "last scsi LUN (should be between 1 and 2^32-1)");
#else
static int __init scsi_luns_setup(char *str)
{
unsigned int tmp;
if (get_option(&str, &tmp) == 1) {
max_scsi_luns = tmp;
return 1;
} else {
printk("scsi_luns_setup : usage max_scsi_luns=n "
"(n should be between 1 and 2^32-1)\n");
return 0;
}
}
__setup("max_scsi_luns=", scsi_luns_setup);
#endif
static void print_inquiry(unsigned char *data)
{
int i;
printk(" Vendor: ");
for (i = 8; i < 16; i++) {
if (data[i] >= 0x20 && i < data[4] + 5)
printk("%c", data[i]);
else
printk(" ");
}
printk(" Model: ");
for (i = 16; i < 32; i++) {
if (data[i] >= 0x20 && i < data[4] + 5)
printk("%c", data[i]);
else
printk(" ");
}
printk(" Rev: ");
for (i = 32; i < 36; i++) {
if (data[i] >= 0x20 && i < data[4] + 5)
printk("%c", data[i]);
else
printk(" ");
}
printk("\n");
i = data[0] & 0x1f;
printk(" Type: %s ",
i < MAX_SCSI_DEVICE_CODE ? scsi_device_types[i] : "Unknown ");
printk(" ANSI SCSI revision: %02x", data[2] & 0x07);
if ((data[2] & 0x07) == 1 && (data[3] & 0x0f) == 1)
printk(" CCS\n");
else
printk("\n");
}
static int get_device_flags(unsigned char *response_data)
{
int i = 0;
unsigned char *pnt;
for (i = 0; 1; i++) {
if (device_list[i].vendor == NULL)
return 0;
pnt = &response_data[8];
while (*pnt && *pnt == ' ')
pnt++;
if (memcmp(device_list[i].vendor, pnt,
strlen(device_list[i].vendor)))
continue;
pnt = &response_data[16];
while (*pnt && *pnt == ' ')
pnt++;
if (memcmp(device_list[i].model, pnt,
strlen(device_list[i].model)))
continue;
return device_list[i].flags;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Detecting SCSI devices :
* We scan all present host adapter's busses, from ID 0 to ID (max_id).
* We use the INQUIRY command, determine device type, and pass the ID /
* lun address of all sequential devices to the tape driver, all random
* devices to the disk driver.
*/
void scan_scsis(struct Scsi_Host *shpnt,
uint hardcoded,
uint hchannel,
uint hid,
uint hlun)
{
uint channel;
unsigned int dev;
unsigned int lun;
unsigned int max_dev_lun;
unsigned char *scsi_result;
unsigned char scsi_result0[256];
Scsi_Device *SDpnt;
Scsi_Device *SDtail;
unsigned int sparse_lun;
int lun0_sl;
scsi_result = NULL;
SDpnt = (Scsi_Device *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Device),
GFP_ATOMIC);
if (SDpnt) {
memset(SDpnt, 0, sizeof(Scsi_Device));
/*
* Register the queue for the device. All I/O requests will
* come in through here. We also need to register a pointer to
* ourselves, since the queue handler won't know what device
* the queue actually represents. We could look it up, but it
* is pointless work.
*/
scsi_initialize_queue(SDpnt, shpnt);
SDpnt->request_queue.queuedata = (void *) SDpnt;
/* Make sure we have something that is valid for DMA purposes */
scsi_result = ((!shpnt->unchecked_isa_dma)
? &scsi_result0[0] : kmalloc(512, GFP_DMA));
}
if (scsi_result == NULL) {
printk("Unable to obtain scsi_result buffer\n");
goto leave;
}
/*
* We must chain ourself in the host_queue, so commands can time out
*/
SDpnt->queue_depth = 1;
SDpnt->host = shpnt;
SDpnt->online = TRUE;
initialize_merge_fn(SDpnt);
/*
* Initialize the object that we will use to wait for command blocks.
*/
init_waitqueue_head(&SDpnt->scpnt_wait);
/*
* Next, hook the device to the host in question.
*/
SDpnt->prev = NULL;
SDpnt->next = NULL;
if (shpnt->host_queue != NULL) {
SDtail = shpnt->host_queue;
while (SDtail->next != NULL)
SDtail = SDtail->next;
SDtail->next = SDpnt;
SDpnt->prev = SDtail;
} else {
shpnt->host_queue = SDpnt;
}
/*
* We need to increment the counter for this one device so we can track
* when things are quiet.
*/
if (hardcoded == 1) {
Scsi_Device *oldSDpnt = SDpnt;
struct Scsi_Device_Template *sdtpnt;
channel = hchannel;
if (channel > shpnt->max_channel)
goto leave;
dev = hid;
if (dev >= shpnt->max_id)
goto leave;
lun = hlun;
if (lun >= shpnt->max_lun)
goto leave;
if ((0 == lun) || (lun > 7))
lun0_sl = SCSI_3; /* actually don't care for 0 == lun */
else
lun0_sl = find_lun0_scsi_level(channel, dev, shpnt);
scan_scsis_single(channel, dev, lun, lun0_sl, &max_dev_lun,
&sparse_lun, &SDpnt, shpnt, scsi_result);
if (SDpnt != oldSDpnt) {
/* it could happen the blockdevice hasn't yet been inited */
/* queue_depth() moved from scsi_proc_info() so that
it is called before scsi_build_commandblocks() */
if (shpnt->select_queue_depths != NULL)
(shpnt->select_queue_depths)(shpnt,
shpnt->host_queue);
for (sdtpnt = scsi_devicelist; sdtpnt; sdtpnt = sdtpnt->next)
if (sdtpnt->init && sdtpnt->dev_noticed)
(*sdtpnt->init) ();
for (sdtpnt = scsi_devicelist; sdtpnt; sdtpnt = sdtpnt->next) {
if (sdtpnt->attach) {
(*sdtpnt->attach) (oldSDpnt);
if (oldSDpnt->attached) {
scsi_build_commandblocks(oldSDpnt);
if (0 == oldSDpnt->has_cmdblocks) {
printk("scan_scsis: DANGER, no command blocks\n");
/* What to do now ?? */
}
}
}
}
scsi_resize_dma_pool();
for (sdtpnt = scsi_devicelist; sdtpnt; sdtpnt = sdtpnt->next) {
if (sdtpnt->finish && sdtpnt->nr_dev) {
(*sdtpnt->finish) ();
}
}
}
} else {
/* Actual LUN. PC ordering is 0->n IBM/spec ordering is n->0 */
int order_dev;
for (channel = 0; channel <= shpnt->max_channel; channel++) {
for (dev = 0; dev < shpnt->max_id; ++dev) {
if (shpnt->reverse_ordering)
/* Shift to scanning 15,14,13... or 7,6,5,4, */
order_dev = shpnt->max_id - dev - 1;
else
order_dev = dev;
if (shpnt->this_id != order_dev) {
/*
* We need the for so our continue, etc. work fine. We put this in
* a variable so that we can override it during the scan if we
* detect a device *KNOWN* to have multiple logical units.
*/
max_dev_lun = (max_scsi_luns < shpnt->max_lun ?
max_scsi_luns : shpnt->max_lun);
sparse_lun = 0;
for (lun = 0, lun0_sl = SCSI_2; lun < max_dev_lun; ++lun) {
/* don't probe further for luns > 7 for targets <= SCSI_2 */
if ((lun0_sl < SCSI_3) && (lun > 7))
break;
if (!scan_scsis_single(channel, order_dev, lun, lun0_sl,
&max_dev_lun, &sparse_lun, &SDpnt, shpnt,
scsi_result)
&& !sparse_lun)
break; /* break means don't probe further for luns!=0 */
if (SDpnt && (0 == lun))
lun0_sl = SDpnt->scsi_level;
} /* for lun ends */
} /* if this_id != id ends */
} /* for dev ends */
} /* for channel ends */
} /* if/else hardcoded */
leave:
{ /* Unchain SRpnt from host_queue */
Scsi_Device *prev, *next;
Scsi_Device *dqptr;
for (dqptr = shpnt->host_queue; dqptr != SDpnt; dqptr = dqptr->next)
continue;
if (dqptr) {
prev = dqptr->prev;
next = dqptr->next;
if (prev)
prev->next = next;
else
shpnt->host_queue = next;
if (next)
next->prev = prev;
}
}
/* Last device block does not exist. Free memory. */
if (SDpnt != NULL) {
blk_cleanup_queue(&SDpnt->request_queue);
kfree((char *) SDpnt);
}
/* If we allocated a buffer so we could do DMA, free it now */
if (scsi_result != &scsi_result0[0] && scsi_result != NULL) {
kfree(scsi_result);
} {
Scsi_Device *sdev;
Scsi_Cmnd *scmd;
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(4, printk("Host status for host %p:\n", shpnt));
for (sdev = shpnt->host_queue; sdev; sdev = sdev->next) {
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(4, printk("Device %d %p: ", sdev->id, sdev));
for (scmd = sdev->device_queue; scmd; scmd = scmd->next) {
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(4, printk("%p ", scmd));
}
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(4, printk("\n"));
}
}
}
/*
* The worker for scan_scsis.
* Returning 0 means Please don't ask further for lun!=0, 1 means OK go on.
* Global variables used : scsi_devices(linked list)
*/
static int scan_scsis_single(unsigned int channel, unsigned int dev,
unsigned int lun, int lun0_scsi_level,
unsigned int *max_dev_lun, unsigned int *sparse_lun,
Scsi_Device ** SDpnt2, struct Scsi_Host *shpnt,
char *scsi_result)
{
char devname[64];
unsigned char scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
struct Scsi_Device_Template *sdtpnt;
Scsi_Device *SDtail, *SDpnt = *SDpnt2;
Scsi_Request * SRpnt;
int bflags, type = -1;
extern devfs_handle_t scsi_devfs_handle;
int scsi_level;
SDpnt->host = shpnt;
SDpnt->id = dev;
SDpnt->lun = lun;
SDpnt->channel = channel;
SDpnt->online = TRUE;
scsi_build_commandblocks(SDpnt);
/* Some low level driver could use device->type (DB) */
SDpnt->type = -1;
/*
* Assume that the device will have handshaking problems, and then fix
* this field later if it turns out it doesn't
*/
SDpnt->borken = 1;
SDpnt->was_reset = 0;
SDpnt->expecting_cc_ua = 0;
SDpnt->starved = 0;
if (NULL == (SRpnt = scsi_allocate_request(SDpnt))) {
printk("scan_scsis_single: no memory\n");
return 0;
}
/*
* We used to do a TEST_UNIT_READY before the INQUIRY but that was
* not really necessary. Spec recommends using INQUIRY to scan for
* devices (and TEST_UNIT_READY to poll for media change). - Paul G.
*/
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk("scsi: performing INQUIRY\n"));
/*
* Build an INQUIRY command block.
*/
scsi_cmd[0] = INQUIRY;
if ((lun > 0) && (lun0_scsi_level <= SCSI_2))
scsi_cmd[1] = (lun << 5) & 0xe0;
else
scsi_cmd[1] = 0; /* SCSI_3 and higher, don't touch */
scsi_cmd[2] = 0;
scsi_cmd[3] = 0;
scsi_cmd[4] = 255;
scsi_cmd[5] = 0;
SRpnt->sr_cmd_len = 0;
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_READ;
scsi_wait_req (SRpnt, (void *) scsi_cmd,
(void *) scsi_result,
256, SCSI_TIMEOUT+4*HZ, 3);
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk("scsi: INQUIRY %s with code 0x%x\n",
SRpnt->sr_result ? "failed" : "successful", SRpnt->sr_result));
/*
* Now that we don't do TEST_UNIT_READY anymore, we must be prepared
* for media change conditions here, so cannot require zero result.
*/
if (SRpnt->sr_result) {
if ((driver_byte(SRpnt->sr_result) & DRIVER_SENSE) != 0 &&
(SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[2] & 0xf) == UNIT_ATTENTION &&
SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x28 &&
SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[13] == 0) {
/* not-ready to ready transition - good */
} else {
/* assume no peripheral if any other sort of error */
scsi_release_request(SRpnt);
return 0;
}
}
/*
* Check for SPARSELUN before checking the peripheral qualifier,
* so sparse lun devices are completely scanned.
*/
/*
* Get any flags for this device.
*/
bflags = get_device_flags (scsi_result);
if (bflags & BLIST_SPARSELUN) {
*sparse_lun = 1;
}
/*
* Check the peripheral qualifier field - this tells us whether LUNS
* are supported here or not.
*/
if ((scsi_result[0] >> 5) == 3) {
scsi_release_request(SRpnt);
return 0; /* assume no peripheral if any sort of error */
}
/* The Toshiba ROM was "gender-changed" here as an inline hack.
This is now much more generic.
This is a mess: What we really want is to leave the scsi_result
alone, and just change the SDpnt structure. And the SDpnt is what
we want print_inquiry to print. -- REW
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_ISDISK) {
scsi_result[0] = TYPE_DISK;
scsi_result[1] |= 0x80; /* removable */
}
if (bflags & BLIST_ISROM) {
scsi_result[0] = TYPE_ROM;
scsi_result[1] |= 0x80; /* removable */
}
memcpy(SDpnt->vendor, scsi_result + 8, 8);
memcpy(SDpnt->model, scsi_result + 16, 16);
memcpy(SDpnt->rev, scsi_result + 32, 4);
SDpnt->removable = (0x80 & scsi_result[1]) >> 7;
/* Use the peripheral qualifier field to determine online/offline */
if (((scsi_result[0] >> 5) & 7) == 1) SDpnt->online = FALSE;
else SDpnt->online = TRUE;
SDpnt->lockable = SDpnt->removable;
SDpnt->changed = 0;
SDpnt->access_count = 0;
SDpnt->busy = 0;
SDpnt->has_cmdblocks = 0;
/*
* Currently, all sequential devices are assumed to be tapes, all random
* devices disk, with the appropriate read only flags set for ROM / WORM
* treated as RO.
*/
switch (type = (scsi_result[0] & 0x1f)) {
case TYPE_TAPE:
case TYPE_DISK:
case TYPE_PRINTER:
case TYPE_MOD:
case TYPE_PROCESSOR:
case TYPE_SCANNER:
case TYPE_MEDIUM_CHANGER:
case TYPE_ENCLOSURE:
case TYPE_COMM:
SDpnt->writeable = 1;
break;
case TYPE_WORM:
case TYPE_ROM:
SDpnt->writeable = 0;
break;
default:
printk("scsi: unknown type %d\n", type);
}
SDpnt->device_blocked = FALSE;
SDpnt->device_busy = 0;
SDpnt->single_lun = 0;
SDpnt->soft_reset =
(scsi_result[7] & 1) && ((scsi_result[3] & 7) == 2);
SDpnt->random = (type == TYPE_TAPE) ? 0 : 1;
SDpnt->type = (type & 0x1f);
print_inquiry(scsi_result);
sprintf (devname, "host%d/bus%d/target%d/lun%d",
SDpnt->host->host_no, SDpnt->channel, SDpnt->id, SDpnt->lun);
if (SDpnt->de) printk ("DEBUG: dir: \"%s\" already exists\n", devname);
else SDpnt->de = devfs_mk_dir (scsi_devfs_handle, devname, NULL);
for (sdtpnt = scsi_devicelist; sdtpnt;
sdtpnt = sdtpnt->next)
if (sdtpnt->detect)
SDpnt->attached +=
(*sdtpnt->detect) (SDpnt);
SDpnt->scsi_level = scsi_result[2] & 0x07;
if (SDpnt->scsi_level >= 2 ||
(SDpnt->scsi_level == 1 &&
(scsi_result[3] & 0x0f) == 1))
SDpnt->scsi_level++;
scsi_level = SDpnt->scsi_level;
/*
* Accommodate drivers that want to sleep when they should be in a polling
* loop.
*/
SDpnt->disconnect = 0;
/*
* Set the tagged_queue flag for SCSI-II devices that purport to support
* tagged queuing in the INQUIRY data.
*/
SDpnt->tagged_queue = 0;
if ((SDpnt->scsi_level >= SCSI_2) &&
(scsi_result[7] & 2) &&
!(bflags & BLIST_NOTQ)) {
SDpnt->tagged_supported = 1;
SDpnt->current_tag = 0;
}
/*
* Some revisions of the Texel CD ROM drives have handshaking problems when
* used with the Seagate controllers. Before we know what type of device
* we're talking to, we assume it's borken and then change it here if it
* turns out that it isn't a TEXEL drive.
*/
if ((bflags & BLIST_BORKEN) == 0)
SDpnt->borken = 0;
/*
* If we want to only allow I/O to one of the luns attached to this device
* at a time, then we set this flag.
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_SINGLELUN)
SDpnt->single_lun = 1;
/*
* These devices need this "key" to unlock the devices so we can use it
*/
if ((bflags & BLIST_KEY) != 0) {
printk("Unlocked floptical drive.\n");
SDpnt->lockable = 0;
scsi_cmd[0] = MODE_SENSE;
if (shpnt->max_lun <= 8)
scsi_cmd[1] = (lun << 5) & 0xe0;
else scsi_cmd[1] = 0; /* any other idea? */
scsi_cmd[2] = 0x2e;
scsi_cmd[3] = 0;
scsi_cmd[4] = 0x2a;
scsi_cmd[5] = 0;
SRpnt->sr_cmd_len = 0;
SRpnt->sr_data_direction = SCSI_DATA_READ;
scsi_wait_req (SRpnt, (void *) scsi_cmd,
(void *) scsi_result, 0x2a,
SCSI_TIMEOUT, 3);
}
scsi_release_request(SRpnt);
SRpnt = NULL;
scsi_release_commandblocks(SDpnt);
/*
* This device was already hooked up to the host in question,
* so at this point we just let go of it and it should be fine. We do need to
* allocate a new one and attach it to the host so that we can further scan the bus.
*/
SDpnt = (Scsi_Device *) kmalloc(sizeof(Scsi_Device), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!SDpnt) {
printk("scsi: scan_scsis_single: Cannot malloc\n");
return 0;
}
memset(SDpnt, 0, sizeof(Scsi_Device));
*SDpnt2 = SDpnt;
SDpnt->queue_depth = 1;
SDpnt->host = shpnt;
SDpnt->online = TRUE;
SDpnt->scsi_level = scsi_level;
/*
* Register the queue for the device. All I/O requests will come
* in through here. We also need to register a pointer to
* ourselves, since the queue handler won't know what device
* the queue actually represents. We could look it up, but it
* is pointless work.
*/
scsi_initialize_queue(SDpnt, shpnt);
SDpnt->host = shpnt;
initialize_merge_fn(SDpnt);
/*
* Mark this device as online, or otherwise we won't be able to do much with it.
*/
SDpnt->online = TRUE;
/*
* Initialize the object that we will use to wait for command blocks.
*/
init_waitqueue_head(&SDpnt->scpnt_wait);
/*
* Since we just found one device, there had damn well better be one in the list
* already.
*/
if (shpnt->host_queue == NULL)
panic("scan_scsis_single: Host queue == NULL\n");
SDtail = shpnt->host_queue;
while (SDtail->next) {
SDtail = SDtail->next;
}
/* Add this device to the linked list at the end */
SDtail->next = SDpnt;
SDpnt->prev = SDtail;
SDpnt->next = NULL;
/*
* Some scsi devices cannot be polled for lun != 0 due to firmware bugs
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_NOLUN)
return 0; /* break; */
/*
* If this device is known to support sparse multiple units, override the
* other settings, and scan all of them.
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_SPARSELUN) {
*max_dev_lun = shpnt->max_lun;
*sparse_lun = 1;
return 1;
}
/*
* If this device is known to support multiple units, override the other
* settings, and scan all of them.
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_FORCELUN) {
/*
* Scanning MAX_SCSI_LUNS units would be a bad idea.
* Any better idea?
* I think we need REPORT LUNS in future to avoid scanning
* of unused LUNs. But, that is another item.
*/
if (*max_dev_lun < shpnt->max_lun)
*max_dev_lun = shpnt->max_lun;
else if ((max_scsi_luns >> 1) >= *max_dev_lun)
*max_dev_lun += shpnt->max_lun;
else *max_dev_lun = max_scsi_luns;
return 1;
}
/*
* REGAL CDC-4X: avoid hang after LUN 4
*/
if (bflags & BLIST_MAX5LUN) {
*max_dev_lun = 5;
return 1;
}
/*
* We assume the device can't handle lun!=0 if: - it reports scsi-0
* (ANSI SCSI Revision 0) (old drives like MAXTOR XT-3280) or - it
* reports scsi-1 (ANSI SCSI Revision 1) and Response Data Format 0
*/
if (((scsi_result[2] & 0x07) == 0)
||
((scsi_result[2] & 0x07) == 1 &&
(scsi_result[3] & 0x0f) == 0))
return 0;
return 1;
}
/*
* The worker for scan_scsis.
* Returns the scsi_level of lun0 on this host, channel and dev (if already
* known), otherwise returns SCSI_2.
*/
static int find_lun0_scsi_level(unsigned int channel, unsigned int dev,
struct Scsi_Host *shpnt)
{
int res = SCSI_2;
Scsi_Device *SDpnt;
for (SDpnt = shpnt->host_queue; SDpnt; SDpnt = SDpnt->next)
{
if ((0 == SDpnt->lun) && (dev == SDpnt->id) &&
(channel == SDpnt->channel))
return (int)SDpnt->scsi_level;
}
/* haven't found lun0, should send INQUIRY but take easy route */
return res;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
@ 2002-06-10 17:04 ` Patrick Mansfield
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mansfield @ 2002-06-10 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: manjuanth n; +Cc: Michael Clark, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:21:39AM -0700, manjuanth n wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
> remains unresolved. I added the following lines to
> scsi_scan.c and recompiled
> {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
> cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
> Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
> revision: 02
> {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
It looks like you are missing a '-' in the above.
-- Patrick Mansfield
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
[not found] <3D04BA0E.7000702@metaparadigm.com>
@ 2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-13 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Clark; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dear Micheal,
Thanks for the solution again, it seems i dont
have any luck. I have patched the kernel with
BLIST_LARGELUN support I have tried all the options
given by u
still success is far away from me. I have made
these changes in the scsi_scan.c
{"IBM", "AuSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
I tried all the possible combination of
BLIST_SPARCE, BLIST_FORCE, etc.
I would like to know whether the LINUX works on SAN
envirnment. I am feeling it has its own limitation
in SAN.
If any one can help to solve my problem it will be a
great help.
To my strange experiance RedHat 6.2 with kernel
2.2-14 without SMP options works fine, withot LUNO
and without luns biengin sequence but we require
multiple cpu option
if RedHat 6.2 works fine i dont know why it is
not implemented in RedHat 7.X. I have tried allthe
possible Redhat vesions
Including the latest RedHat 7.3. To my suprise the
RedHat does not boot at all if the qlogic driver is
enabled at boot.
and have the same problem of LUN0 and sequence
LUNs. Is really Linux operating sytem is matured
enough to work as high end
server????
Pl can any body help???
The details of machine
uname -a Linux m1 2.4.19-pre10 #12 SMP Thu Jun 13
05:48:37 IST 2002 i686 unknown
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 01
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 02
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*36 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 03
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*18 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 04
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*2 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
cat /proc/partition
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse
wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
8 0 35548160 sda 4426 7059 90710 33350 4064
4259 66776 78920 0 36970 112310
8 1 5168614 sda1 4135 6674 86466 30360 2569
3334 47464 57210 0 30850 87600
8 2 23554944 sda2 268 299 3978 2880 1491 922
19280 21680 0 14080 24560
8 3 2096262 sda3 3 0 24 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 30
8 4 1 sda4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 5 4720558 sda5 18 80 226 60 4 3 32 40 0 90
100
8 16 56905920 sdb 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 17 56902198 sdb1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 32 56905920 sdc 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 33 2097136 sdc1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 48 512153280 sdd 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 49 512152168 sdd1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 64 256076640 sde 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 65 51207156 sde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 80 28452960 sdf 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 81 28452848 sdf1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 653856 hda 1 3 16 30 0 0 0 0 -1145
643450 13929193
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> Did you try BLIST_SPARSELUN on the Hitachi
> devices?
>
> Also, your devices are reporting as SCSI level 2 so
> no scanning will be done past lun 7 (This is only
> done for SCSI-3 devices). There is a patch
> floating around that adds BLIST_LARGELUN
> to make the scanning code treat these devices
> as SCSI-3 (255 luns)
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/10/02 22:21, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear Michael,
> >
> >Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
> >remains unresolved. I added the following lines
> to
> > scsi_scan.c and recompiled
> > {"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN |
> >BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> >
> > the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
> > cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> >Attached devices:
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Direct-Access ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev:
> 0116
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >
> >If u can help me out where i am doing the mistake
>
> >it will be of great help.
> >plfind the enclosed scsi_scan.c file. Is there any
> >method or commands to find out BLIST_FORCELUN is
> >enabled?
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> >Manjunath
> >
> >
> >--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> >>drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >>to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
> >>
> >>Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model
> and
> >>add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
> >>
> >>...
> >>{"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> >>
> >>If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> >>BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is
> correct
> >>will force scanning of all luns.
> >>
> >>I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> >>eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> >>which kernel has it.
> >>
> >>~mc
> >>
> >>On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear sir,
> >>>we have SAN environment with hitachi storage
> box
> >>>and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Linux
> >>
> >>
> >>>with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >>>problems
> >>>1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>see
> >>
> >>
> >>>any LUNs on liunx machine
> >>>2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the
> LUNS
> >>>but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>etc
> >>
> >>
> >>>if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> >>>
> >>>
> >>LUNS
> >>
> >>
> >>>4 and the rest
> >>>Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >>>Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >>>
> >>>Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks and Regards
> >>>Manjuanth
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >>>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> >>>
> >>>
> >>"unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>
> >>
> >>>the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>More majordomo info at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >/*
> > * scsi_scan.c Copyright (C) 2000 Eric Youngdale
> > *
> > * Bus scan logic.
> > *
> > * This used to live in scsi.c, but that file was
> just a laundry basket
> > * full of misc stuff. This got separated out in
> order to make things
> > * clearer.
> > */
> >
> >#define __NO_VERSION__
> >#include <linux/config.h>
> >#include <linux/module.h>
> >#include <linux/init.h>
> >
> >#include <linux/blk.h>
> >
> >#include "scsi.h"
> >#include "hosts.h"
> >#include "constants.h"
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
[not found] <3D04BA0E.7000702@metaparadigm.com>
2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
@ 2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-13 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Clark; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dear Micheal,
Thanks for the solution again, it seems i dont
have any luck. I have patched the kernel with
BLIST_LARGELUN support I have tried all the options
given by u
still success is far away from me. I have made
these changes in the scsi_scan.c
{"IBM", "AuSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
I tried all the possible combination of
BLIST_SPARCE, BLIST_FORCE, etc.
I would like to know whether the LINUX works on SAN
envirnment. I am feeling it has its own limitation
in SAN.
If any one can help to solve my problem it will be a
great help.
To my strange experiance RedHat 6.2 with kernel
2.2-14 without SMP options works fine, withot LUNO
and without luns biengin sequence but we require
multiple cpu option
if RedHat 6.2 works fine i dont know why it is
not implemented in RedHat 7.X. I have tried allthe
possible Redhat vesions
Including the latest RedHat 7.3. To my suprise the
RedHat does not boot at all if the qlogic driver is
enabled at boot.
and have the same problem of LUN0 and sequence
LUNs. Is really Linux operating sytem is matured
enough to work as high end
server????
Pl can any body help???
The details of machine
uname -a Linux m1 2.4.19-pre10 #12 SMP Thu Jun 13
05:48:37 IST 2002 i686 unknown
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 01
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 02
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*36 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 03
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*18 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 04
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*2 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
cat /proc/partition
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse
wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
8 0 35548160 sda 4426 7059 90710 33350 4064
4259 66776 78920 0 36970 112310
8 1 5168614 sda1 4135 6674 86466 30360 2569
3334 47464 57210 0 30850 87600
8 2 23554944 sda2 268 299 3978 2880 1491 922
19280 21680 0 14080 24560
8 3 2096262 sda3 3 0 24 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 30
8 4 1 sda4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 5 4720558 sda5 18 80 226 60 4 3 32 40 0 90
100
8 16 56905920 sdb 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 17 56902198 sdb1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 32 56905920 sdc 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 33 2097136 sdc1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 48 512153280 sdd 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 49 512152168 sdd1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 64 256076640 sde 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 65 51207156 sde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 80 28452960 sdf 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 81 28452848 sdf1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 653856 hda 1 3 16 30 0 0 0 0 -1145
643450 13929193
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> Did you try BLIST_SPARSELUN on the Hitachi
> devices?
>
> Also, your devices are reporting as SCSI level 2 so
> no scanning will be done past lun 7 (This is only
> done for SCSI-3 devices). There is a patch
> floating around that adds BLIST_LARGELUN
> to make the scanning code treat these devices
> as SCSI-3 (255 luns)
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/10/02 22:21, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear Michael,
> >
> >Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
> >remains unresolved. I added the following lines
> to
> > scsi_scan.c and recompiled
> > {"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN |
> >BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> >
> > the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
> > cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> >Attached devices:
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Direct-Access ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev:
> 0116
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >
> >If u can help me out where i am doing the mistake
>
> >it will be of great help.
> >plfind the enclosed scsi_scan.c file. Is there any
> >method or commands to find out BLIST_FORCELUN is
> >enabled?
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> >Manjunath
> >
> >
> >--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> >>drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >>to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
> >>
> >>Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model
> and
> >>add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
> >>
> >>...
> >>{"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> >>
> >>If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> >>BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is
> correct
> >>will force scanning of all luns.
> >>
> >>I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> >>eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> >>which kernel has it.
> >>
> >>~mc
> >>
> >>On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear sir,
> >>>we have SAN environment with hitachi storage
> box
> >>>and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Linux
> >>
> >>
> >>>with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >>>problems
> >>>1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>see
> >>
> >>
> >>>any LUNs on liunx machine
> >>>2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the
> LUNS
> >>>but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>etc
> >>
> >>
> >>>if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> >>>
> >>>
> >>LUNS
> >>
> >>
> >>>4 and the rest
> >>>Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >>>Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >>>
> >>>Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks and Regards
> >>>Manjuanth
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >>>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> >>>
> >>>
> >>"unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>
> >>
> >>>the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>More majordomo info at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >/*
> > * scsi_scan.c Copyright (C) 2000 Eric Youngdale
> > *
> > * Bus scan logic.
> > *
> > * This used to live in scsi.c, but that file was
> just a laundry basket
> > * full of misc stuff. This got separated out in
> order to make things
> > * clearer.
> > */
> >
> >#define __NO_VERSION__
> >#include <linux/config.h>
> >#include <linux/module.h>
> >#include <linux/init.h>
> >
> >#include <linux/blk.h>
> >
> >#include "scsi.h"
> >#include "hosts.h"
> >#include "constants.h"
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
@ 2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-13 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Clark; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dear Micheal,
Thanks for the solution again, it seems i dont
have any luck. I have patched the kernel with
BLIST_LARGELUN support I have tried all the options
given by u
still success is far away from me. I have made
these changes in the scsi_scan.c
{"IBM", "AuSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
I tried all the possible combination of
BLIST_SPARCE, BLIST_FORCE, etc.
I would like to know whether the LINUX works on SAN
envirnment. I am feeling it has its own limitation
in SAN.
If any one can help to solve my problem it will be a
great help.
To my strange experiance RedHat 6.2 with kernel
2.2-14 without SMP options works fine, withot LUNO
and without luns biengin sequence but we require
multiple cpu option
if RedHat 6.2 works fine i dont know why it is
not implemented in RedHat 7.X. I have tried allthe
possible Redhat vesions
Including the latest RedHat 7.3. To my suprise the
RedHat does not boot at all if the qlogic driver is
enabled at boot.
and have the same problem of LUN0 and sequence
LUNs. Is really Linux operating sytem is matured
enough to work as high end
server????
Pl can any body help???
The details of machine
uname -a Linux m1 2.4.19-pre10 #12 SMP Thu Jun 13
05:48:37 IST 2002 i686 unknown
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 01
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 02
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*36 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 03
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*18 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 04
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*2 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
cat /proc/partition
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse
wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
8 0 35548160 sda 4426 7059 90710 33350 4064
4259 66776 78920 0 36970 112310
8 1 5168614 sda1 4135 6674 86466 30360 2569
3334 47464 57210 0 30850 87600
8 2 23554944 sda2 268 299 3978 2880 1491 922
19280 21680 0 14080 24560
8 3 2096262 sda3 3 0 24 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 30
8 4 1 sda4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 5 4720558 sda5 18 80 226 60 4 3 32 40 0 90
100
8 16 56905920 sdb 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 17 56902198 sdb1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 32 56905920 sdc 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 33 2097136 sdc1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 48 512153280 sdd 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 49 512152168 sdd1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 64 256076640 sde 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 65 51207156 sde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 80 28452960 sdf 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 81 28452848 sdf1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 653856 hda 1 3 16 30 0 0 0 0 -1145
643450 13929193
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> Did you try BLIST_SPARSELUN on the Hitachi
> devices?
>
> Also, your devices are reporting as SCSI level 2 so
> no scanning will be done past lun 7 (This is only
> done for SCSI-3 devices). There is a patch
> floating around that adds BLIST_LARGELUN
> to make the scanning code treat these devices
> as SCSI-3 (255 luns)
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/10/02 22:21, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear Michael,
> >
> >Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
> >remains unresolved. I added the following lines
> to
> > scsi_scan.c and recompiled
> > {"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN |
> >BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> >
> > the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
> > cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> >Attached devices:
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Direct-Access ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev:
> 0116
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >
> >If u can help me out where i am doing the mistake
>
> >it will be of great help.
> >plfind the enclosed scsi_scan.c file. Is there any
> >method or commands to find out BLIST_FORCELUN is
> >enabled?
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> >Manjunath
> >
> >
> >--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> >>drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >>to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
> >>
> >>Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model
> and
> >>add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
> >>
> >>...
> >>{"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> >>
> >>If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> >>BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is
> correct
> >>will force scanning of all luns.
> >>
> >>I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> >>eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> >>which kernel has it.
> >>
> >>~mc
> >>
> >>On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear sir,
> >>>we have SAN environment with hitachi storage
> box
> >>>and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Linux
> >>
> >>
> >>>with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >>>problems
> >>>1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>see
> >>
> >>
> >>>any LUNs on liunx machine
> >>>2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the
> LUNS
> >>>but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>etc
> >>
> >>
> >>>if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> >>>
> >>>
> >>LUNS
> >>
> >>
> >>>4 and the rest
> >>>Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >>>Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >>>
> >>>Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks and Regards
> >>>Manjuanth
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >>>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> >>>
> >>>
> >>"unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>
> >>
> >>>the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>More majordomo info at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >/*
> > * scsi_scan.c Copyright (C) 2000 Eric Youngdale
> > *
> > * Bus scan logic.
> > *
> > * This used to live in scsi.c, but that file was
> just a laundry basket
> > * full of misc stuff. This got separated out in
> order to make things
> > * clearer.
> > */
> >
> >#define __NO_VERSION__
> >#include <linux/config.h>
> >#include <linux/module.h>
> >#include <linux/init.h>
> >
> >#include <linux/blk.h>
> >
> >#include "scsi.h"
> >#include "hosts.h"
> >#include "constants.h"
>
=== message truncated ===
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> 2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
>
> Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model and
> add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
>
> ...
> {"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
>
> If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is correct
> will force scanning of all luns.
>
> I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> which kernel has it.
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear sir,
> > we have SAN environment with hitachi storage box
> >and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> Linux
> >with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >problems
> >1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> see
> >any LUNs on liunx machine
> >2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the LUNS
> >but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
> etc
> >if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> LUNS
> >4 and the rest
> > Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >
> >Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >
> >Thanks and Regards
> >Manjuanth
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
@ 2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: manjuanth n @ 2002-06-13 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Clark; +Cc: linux-kernel
Dear Micheal,
Thanks for the solution again, it seems i dont
have any luck. I have patched the kernel with
BLIST_LARGELUN support I have tried all the options
given by u
still success is far away from me. I have made
these changes in the scsi_scan.c
{"IBM", "AuSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
{"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*", BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SPARSELUN},
I tried all the possible combination of
BLIST_SPARCE, BLIST_FORCE, etc.
I would like to know whether the LINUX works on SAN
envirnment. I am feeling it has its own limitation
in SAN.
If any one can help to solve my problem it will be a
great help.
To my strange experiance RedHat 6.2 with kernel
2.2-14 without SMP options works fine, withot LUNO
and without luns biengin sequence but we require
multiple cpu option
if RedHat 6.2 works fine i dont know why it is
not implemented in RedHat 7.X. I have tried allthe
possible Redhat vesions
Including the latest RedHat 7.3. To my suprise the
RedHat does not boot at all if the qlogic driver is
enabled at boot.
and have the same problem of LUN0 and sequence
LUNs. Is really Linux operating sytem is matured
enough to work as high end
server????
Pl can any body help???
The details of machine
uname -a Linux m1 2.4.19-pre10 #12 SMP Thu Jun 13
05:48:37 IST 2002 i686 unknown
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev: 1.00
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
Type: Processor ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 01
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 02
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*36 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 03
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*18 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 04
Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*2 Rev: 0116
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 02
cat /proc/partition
major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse
wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq
8 0 35548160 sda 4426 7059 90710 33350 4064
4259 66776 78920 0 36970 112310
8 1 5168614 sda1 4135 6674 86466 30360 2569
3334 47464 57210 0 30850 87600
8 2 23554944 sda2 268 299 3978 2880 1491 922
19280 21680 0 14080 24560
8 3 2096262 sda3 3 0 24 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 30
8 4 1 sda4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 5 4720558 sda5 18 80 226 60 4 3 32 40 0 90
100
8 16 56905920 sdb 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 17 56902198 sdb1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 32 56905920 sdc 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 33 2097136 sdc1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 48 512153280 sdd 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 49 512152168 sdd1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 64 256076640 sde 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 65 51207156 sde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 80 28452960 sdf 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 81 28452848 sdf1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 653856 hda 1 3 16 30 0 0 0 0 -1145
643450 13929193
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> Did you try BLIST_SPARSELUN on the Hitachi
> devices?
>
> Also, your devices are reporting as SCSI level 2 so
> no scanning will be done past lun 7 (This is only
> done for SCSI-3 devices). There is a patch
> floating around that adds BLIST_LARGELUN
> to make the scanning code treat these devices
> as SCSI-3 (255 luns)
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/10/02 22:21, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear Michael,
> >
> >Thanks for the solution, but my problem still
> >remains unresolved. I added the following lines
> to
> > scsi_scan.c and recompiled
> > {"IBM", "AvSaV1S2", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN |
> >BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*4", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*18", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*8", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "OPEN E*36", "*",
> BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF400", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF500", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > {"HITACHI", "DF600", "*", BLIST_FORCELUN},
> >
> > the out put of the scsi venders are as follows
> > cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> >Attached devices:
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Direct-Access ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 15 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: SERVERAID Rev:
> 1.0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 01
> >Host: scsi2 Channel: 01 Id: 08 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: IBM Model: AuSaV1S2 Rev: 0
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: HITACHI Model: OPEN-E*4 Rev:
> 0116
> > Type: Processor ANSI
> SCSI
> >revision: 02
> >
> >If u can help me out where i am doing the mistake
>
> >it will be of great help.
> >plfind the enclosed scsi_scan.c file. Is there any
> >method or commands to find out BLIST_FORCELUN is
> >enabled?
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> >Manjunath
> >
> >
> >--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> >>drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> >>to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
> >>
> >>Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model
> and
> >>add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
> >>
> >>...
> >>{"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
> >>
> >>If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> >>BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is
> correct
> >>will force scanning of all luns.
> >>
> >>I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> >>eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> >>which kernel has it.
> >>
> >>~mc
> >>
> >>On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear sir,
> >>>we have SAN environment with hitachi storage
> box
> >>>and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Linux
> >>
> >>
> >>>with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >>>problems
> >>>1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>see
> >>
> >>
> >>>any LUNs on liunx machine
> >>>2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the
> LUNS
> >>>but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>etc
> >>
> >>
> >>>if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> >>>
> >>>
> >>LUNS
> >>
> >>
> >>>4 and the rest
> >>>Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >>>Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >>>
> >>>Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks and Regards
> >>>Manjuanth
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >>>http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> >>>
> >>>
> >>"unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>
> >>
> >>>the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>More majordomo info at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >/*
> > * scsi_scan.c Copyright (C) 2000 Eric Youngdale
> > *
> > * Bus scan logic.
> > *
> > * This used to live in scsi.c, but that file was
> just a laundry basket
> > * full of misc stuff. This got separated out in
> order to make things
> > * clearer.
> > */
> >
> >#define __NO_VERSION__
> >#include <linux/config.h>
> >#include <linux/module.h>
> >#include <linux/init.h>
> >
> >#include <linux/blk.h>
> >
> >#include "scsi.h"
> >#include "hosts.h"
> >#include "constants.h"
>
=== message truncated ===
--- Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com> wrote:
> 2.4.18 needs a hint added to
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> to allow it to scan targets with sparse luns.
>
> Look in /proc/scsi/scsi for the vendor and model and
> add them into the device_list array in scsi_scan.c
>
> ...
> {"<VENDOR>", "<MODEL>", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN},
>
> If you don't configure lun 0, you may have to use
> BLIST_FORCELUN which if my understanding is correct
> will force scanning of all luns.
>
> I hear there is some REPORT_LUNS code that will
> eliminate the need to do this, although don't know
> which kernel has it.
>
> ~mc
>
> On 06/08/02 19:27, manjuanth n wrote:
>
> >Dear sir,
> > we have SAN environment with hitachi storage box
> >and brocade switch. we are trying to install
> Linux
> >with qlogic HBA card. we are facing strange
> >problems
> >1. If we disable LUN 0 we will not be able to
> see
> >any LUNs on liunx machine
> >2. If we enable LUN 0 we can see all the LUNS
> >but it should be in sequence i.e LUN0 ,1,2 , 3
> etc
> >if we disable LUN 3 we will not be able to see
> LUNS
> >4 and the rest
> > Is the above things are limitation of linux.
> >Linux machine is running with 2.4.18 kernel
> >
> >Is there any solutions for these problems?
> >
> >Thanks and Regards
> >Manjuanth
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* need help
@ 2003-10-30 7:51 Pius Jerry
2003-10-30 9:30 ` Nick Piggin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pius Jerry @ 2003-10-30 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I need your help and I hope you can be of help, am a user of linux
and I want to ask if you can show me how to disable an IP with the linux
and enable it through the linux
thanks
am Pius Jerry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2003-10-30 7:51 need help Pius Jerry
@ 2003-10-30 9:30 ` Nick Piggin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2003-10-30 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pius Jerry; +Cc: linux-kernel
Pius Jerry wrote:
>Hello,
> I need your help and I hope you can be of help, am a user of linux
>and I want to ask if you can show me how to disable an IP with the linux
>and enable it through the linux
>thanks
>am Pius Jerry
>
Hi Pius,
This is the kernel development list. Please ask future questions in a
help list. However, have a look at the manpages for ifconfig(8) and ip(8).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* need help
@ 2007-04-06 7:49 vjn
2007-04-08 18:00 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: vjn @ 2007-04-06 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
in my project i want to code the kernel such that when i plugged my usb it
should ask for password and check it in the kernel space . can anyone help
me
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/need-help-tf3535625.html#a9868997
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
[not found] <86Xi2-6La-421@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2007-04-06 21:24 ` Bodo Eggert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bodo Eggert @ 2007-04-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vjn, linux-kernel
vjn <vjn.raj@gmail.com> wrote:
> in my project i want to code the kernel such that when i plugged my usb it
> should ask for password and check it in the kernel space . can anyone help
> me
No, since the kernel has no way to ask for input. Imagine a two-seated
machine with two keyboards, mice and monitors, one terminal at each serial
port, three users logging in using XDM and one disconnected screen session
on tty6. Who's going to be asked? And in case of X11 or XDM: How should the
kernel authenticate to the user's screen?
--
A beggar walked up to a well-dressed woman shopping on Rodeo
Drive and said, "I haven't eaten anything for days."
She looked at him and said, "God, I wish I had your willpower."
Friß, Spammer: O5YrJ-q@gshdlY.7eggert.dyndns.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: need help
2007-04-06 7:49 vjn
@ 2007-04-08 18:00 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2007-04-08 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vjn; +Cc: linux-kernel
vjn wrote:
> in my project i want to code the kernel such that when i plugged my usb it
> should ask for password and check it in the kernel space . can anyone help
> me
I think the correct solution is to use an excrypted mount, and issue the
mount command manually with the question in user space. There's no code
to ask for input, nor anyway to positively decide which connected
terminal is the terminal to ask.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-08 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-30 7:51 need help Pius Jerry
2003-10-30 9:30 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] <86Xi2-6La-421@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-04-06 21:24 ` Bodo Eggert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-06 7:49 vjn
2007-04-08 18:00 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <3D04BA0E.7000702@metaparadigm.com>
2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-08 11:27 manjuanth n
2002-06-08 19:43 ` Michael Clark
2002-06-10 14:21 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-10 17:04 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
2002-06-13 14:25 ` manjuanth n
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox