Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12

Tom Rix
2021-01-10T15:48:20Z

On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
>> changes for FPGA DFL.
> Is there something I can do to help ?
>
> I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
>
> Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly.
>
> 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state.
>
> 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches

I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next

fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing

fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution

These are respectively

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing

There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now.

fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs

fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

respectively

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com/

There are a couple of patchsets that conflict

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@intel.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com/

Which I will follow up on.

And the xilinx patchset

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xilinx.com/

Which is being split/worked on offline.

If I have missed any patchset, poke me.

Tom

>
> Tom
>
>