Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12

Greg KH
2021-01-11T06:56:55Z

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 1/10/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:46:29AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> >> On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> >>> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> >>>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
> >>>> changes for FPGA DFL.
> >>> Is there something I can do to help ?
> >>>
> >>> I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
> >>>
> >>> Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly.
> >>>
> >>> 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state.
> > Is it not? It currently points to v5.11-rc1. If I start applying patches
> > that require the changes that went into Greg's branch I can merge.
>
> I mean the window between when we have staged patches and when they go into Greg's branch.
>
> We don't have any now, maybe those two trival ones.
>
> Since Greg's branch moves much faster than ours, our staging branch needs to be rebased regularly until its merge.

Ick, no! NEVER rebase a public branch. Why does it matter the speed of
my branch vs. anyone elses? Git handles merges very well.

Just like Linus's branches move much faster than mine, and I don't
rebase my branches, you shouldn't rebase yours.

Becides, I'm only taking _PATCHES_ for fpga changes at the moment, no
git pulls, so why does it matter at all for any of this?

What is the problem you are trying to solve here?

thanks,

greg k-h