From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
jxgao@google.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: mark unmapped DMA scatter/gather invalid
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:15:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/x5v4Gjretp4lii@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111154335.23388-1-marcorr@google.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:43:35AM -0800, Marc Orr wrote:
> This patch updates dma_direct_unmap_sg() to mark each scatter/gather
> entry invalid, after it's unmapped. This fixes two issues:
>
> 1. It makes the unmapping code able to tolerate a double unmap.
> 2. It prevents the NVMe driver from erroneously treating an unmapped DMA
> address as mapped.
>
> The bug that motivated this patch was the following sequence, which
> occurred within the NVMe driver, with the kernel flag `swiotlb=force`.
>
> * NVMe driver calls dma_direct_map_sg()
> * dma_direct_map_sg() fails part way through the scatter gather/list
> * dma_direct_map_sg() calls dma_direct_unmap_sg() to unmap any entries
> succeeded.
> * NVMe driver calls dma_direct_unmap_sg(), redundantly, leading to a
> double unmap, which is a bug.
>
> With this patch, a hadoop workload running on a cluster of three AMD
> SEV VMs, is able to succeed. Without the patch, the hadoop workload
> suffers application-level and even VM-level failures.
>
> Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
> Tested-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 15:43 [PATCH] dma: mark unmapped DMA scatter/gather invalid Marc Orr
2021-01-11 16:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 18:03 ` Marc Orr
2021-01-11 20:39 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 21:36 ` Marc Orr
2021-01-11 16:15 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/x5v4Gjretp4lii@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox