public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Hua Zhong <huaz@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux/macros.h(new) and linux/list.h(mod) ...
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20010705150624.davidel@xmailserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107052154.RAA07008@razor.cs.columbia.edu>


On 05-Jul-2001 Hua Zhong wrote:
> 
> Doesn't it add more overhead?  I think using inline functions are much
> better. 
>  Yes you have to define it for different types (char, short, int, long, 
> signed/unsigned).

Yes it does.
Personally I know that min, max, etc... are macros and I never use unary
operators inside.
Maybe a "unsafe" __max() and a "safe" max() could coexist.




- Davide


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-05 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-05 20:57 linux/macros.h(new) and linux/list.h(mod) Davide Libenzi
2001-07-05 21:31 ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-05 21:45   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-05 21:54     ` Hua Zhong
2001-07-05 21:58       ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-05 22:20         ` Hua Zhong
2001-07-05 22:06       ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2001-07-05 22:10     ` J . A . Magallon
2001-07-05 22:33     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-05 22:43     ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-05 22:53       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-05 23:23         ` J . A . Magallon
2001-07-05 22:57       ` Alan Cox
2001-07-05 23:05         ` Matthew Dharm
2001-07-05 23:07           ` Alan Cox
2001-07-05 23:08         ` David Woodhouse
2001-07-06  1:51           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-07-05 23:21         ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]           ` <0107060149080M.03760@starship>
2001-07-05 23:54             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-06 17:38         ` Neil Booth
2001-07-06 22:02           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-07-05 22:03 ` Kai Germaschewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.20010705150624.davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=huaz@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox