public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPU affinity & IPI latency (FIX)_
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:56:06 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20010719095606.davidel@xmailserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF592B2674.D77BFDC0-ON85256A8C.00649982@pok.ibm.com>


On 17-Jul-2001 Hubertus Franke wrote:
> 
> 
> This only applies only to the idle thread and it says that the idle
> thread actively monitors its need_resched flag and hence will
> instantly call schedule() at that point. Hence there won't be any
> delay either for IPI or for waiting to return from the kernel.
> 
> You might be right that the problem situation still arises, because
> the idle_thread needs to content again for the lock.
> Let me ask the otherway around, why do we HAVE to put it in ?
> And if I missed something here, we put it outside the <if> clause.

Yep, we were talking about two different if-locations :)
Anyway, it's right, using the poll idle we've to change the position of the
assignment.




- Davide


  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-19 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-17 18:28 [Lse-tech] Re: CPU affinity & IPI latency (FIX)_ Hubertus Franke
2001-07-19 16:56 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
     [not found] <OF51487F8A.564A5A7D-ON85256A8C.0063C208@pok.ibm.com>
2001-07-17 18:12 ` Hubertus Franke
     [not found] <OF46AE0C03.7FA13916-ON85256A8C.005E4CEB@pok.ibm.com>
2001-07-17 17:33 ` Hubertus Frnake
2001-07-17 18:00   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-17 18:11   ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.20010719095606.davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=frankeh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox