From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Gordon Oliver <gordo@pincoya.com>
Cc: Gordon Oliver <gordo@pincoya.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:09:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20010924130908.davidel@xmailserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010924203406.B9688@kushida.jlokier.co.uk>
On 24-Sep-2001 Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > As Davide points out in his reply, /dev/epoll is an exact clone of
>> > the O_SETSIG/O_SETOWN/O_ASYNC realtime signal way of getting readiness
>> > change events, but using a memory-mapped buffer instead of signal delivery
>> > (and obeying an interest mask). Unlike /dev/poll, it only provides
>> > information about *changes* in readiness.
>>
>> Right. But it does one additional thing that the rtsig method doesn't
>> it collapses multiple readiness *changes* into a single readiness change.
>> This allows the kernel to keep a fixed size buffer so you never need
>> to fallback to poll as you need to with the rtsig approach.
>
> That could be added to rtsigs, with the same result: no need to fallback
> to poll.
There's already a patch that implement this.
> You could even keep the memory for the queued signal / event inside the file structure.
By keeping the event structure inside the file* require you to collect
these events ( read memory moves ) at peek time.
With /dev/epoll the event is directly dropped inside the mmaped area.
- Davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-24 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-24 4:16 [PATCH] /dev/epoll update Dan Kegel
2001-09-24 19:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 19:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 20:09 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2001-09-24 21:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-25 9:25 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25 8:12 ` Dan Kegel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-20 3:49 [patch] " Davide Libenzi
[not found] <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BB03C6A.7D1DD7B3@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAEB39B.DE7932CF@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25 17:36 ` [PATCH] " Jonathan Lemon
2001-09-25 18:34 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-21 6:22 Dan Kegel
2001-09-21 18:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 2:20 Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 6:25 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 7:04 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 15:37 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 15:59 ` Zach Brown
2001-09-19 17:12 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 17:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 18:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 17:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 19:03 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 19:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 21:49 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 22:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 23:24 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 23:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 2:13 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-20 2:28 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 3:03 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-20 16:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 4:32 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20 4:43 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20 5:05 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 18:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 19:33 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 19:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 17:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 0:11 ` Gordon Oliver
2001-09-24 0:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 19:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 20:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-21 5:59 ` Ton Hospel
2001-09-21 16:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 17:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-07 19:27 Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=XFMail.20010924130908.davidel@xmailserver.org \
--to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=gordo@pincoya.com \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox