From: Giuliano Pochini <pochini@shiny.it>
To: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.40-mm1 with contest
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:43:15 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20021204094315.pochini@shiny.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1038953338.3ded2b7a5fe0d@kolivas.net>
On 03-Dec-2002 Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> UP results
>
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.4.20 [5] 108.1 58 84 40 1.62
> 2.5.50-mm1 [5] 86.6 78 18 20 1.30
Hm, load task gets half cpu time, but it goes 5 times slower
in 2.5.x. Why ? You can see a similar behaviour in other
tests too.
Bye.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-04 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 22:08 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.40-mm1 with contest Con Kolivas
2002-12-04 8:43 ` Giuliano Pochini [this message]
2002-12-04 9:28 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=XFMail.20021204094315.pochini@shiny.it \
--to=pochini@shiny.it \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox