Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section

Matthias Männich
2023-02-22T11:38:32Z

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@google.com wrote:
> > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> >
> > Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to
> > the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and
> > picked up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c
> > F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c
> > F: samples/bpf/
> > F: scripts/bpf_doc.py
> > +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh
> > F: tools/bpf/
> > F: tools/lib/bpf/
> > F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> > --
> > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> >
>
> No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be
> making new patches against them, right?

This one is optional, but it makes the next one apply cleanly and I
picked the entire series.

Cheers,
Matthias

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h