public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: longman@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] locking/rwsem: Unify wait loop
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:33:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/gUAdaFf20PDUkO@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/e/I1aqDAjoq2Rs@boqun-archlinux>

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:31:47AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
[..]
> > +#define waiter_type(_waiter, _r, _w)	\
> > +	((_waiter)->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ ? (_r) : (_w))
> > +
> > +static __always_inline struct rw_semaphore *
> > +rwsem_waiter_wait(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter, int state)
> > +{
> > +	trace_contention_begin(sem, waiter_type(waiter, LCB_F_READ, LCB_F_WRITE));
> > +
> > +	/* wait to be given the lock */
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		set_current_state(state);
> > +		if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter->task)) {
> > +			/* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > +			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> 
> Move the below __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)s up here? I think we
> need the preemption protection when changing the task state here.
> 

Nevermind since we have the preemption protection for the whole
function... but merging two __set_current_state()s into one still looks
good.

Regards,
Boqun

> > +			if (waiter->task)
> > +				goto out_nolock;
> 
[...]
> > +
> > +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > +	lockevent_inc(waiter_type(waiter, rwsem_rlock, rwsem_wlock));
> > +	trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > +	return sem;
> > +
> > +out_nolock:
> > +	rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, waiter);
> > +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > +	lockevent_inc(waiter_type(waiter, rwsem_rlock_fail, rwsem_wlock_fail));
> > +	trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > +	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Wait for the read lock to be granted
> >   */
> > @@ -1071,38 +1109,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semap
> >  	if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q))
> >  		wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> >  
> > -	trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_READ);
> > -
> > -	/* wait to be given the lock */
> > -	for (;;) {
> > -		set_current_state(state);
> > -		if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
> > -			/* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> > -		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > -			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > -			if (waiter.task)
> > -				goto out_nolock;
> > -			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > -			/* Ordered by sem->wait_lock against rwsem_mark_wake(). */
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> > -		schedule_preempt_disabled();
> > -		lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_reader);
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > -	lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock);
> > -	trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > -	return sem;
> > -
> > -out_nolock:
> > -	rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q);
> > -	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > -	lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail);
> > -	trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > -	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > +	return rwsem_waiter_wait(sem, &waiter, state);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -1150,37 +1157,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
> >  	}
> >  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> >  
> > -	/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
> > -	trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_WRITE);
> > -
> > -	for (;;) {
> > -		set_current_state(state);
> > -		if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
> > -			/* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> > -		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > -			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > -			if (waiter.task)
> > -				goto out_nolock;
> > -			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > -			/* Ordered by sem->wait_lock against rwsem_mark_wake(). */
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> > -		schedule_preempt_disabled();
> > -		lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
> > -	}
> > -	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > -	lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock);
> > -	trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > -	return sem;
> > -
> > -out_nolock:
> > -	rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q);
> > -	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > -	lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_fail);
> > -	trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > -	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > +	return rwsem_waiter_wait(sem, &waiter, state);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-24  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-23 12:26 [PATCH 0/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup and handoff Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/rwsem: Minor code refactoring in rwsem_mark_wake() Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/rwsem: Enforce queueing when HANDOFF Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 21:38   ` Waiman Long
2023-02-26 11:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 12:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 21:31       ` Waiman Long
2023-02-26 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 15:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 16:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-27  0:22       ` Waiman Long
2023-02-27 10:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-27 20:16           ` Waiman Long
2023-03-20  8:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-20 17:36               ` Waiman Long
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] locking/rwsem: Split out rwsem_reader_wake() Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] locking/rwsem: Unify wait loop Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 19:31   ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-24  1:33     ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-02-26 12:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 18:22         ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-23 22:45   ` Waiman Long
2023-02-26 16:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] locking/rwsem: Use the force Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-24  1:19 ` [PATCH 0/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup and handoff Waiman Long
2023-02-24 11:55   ` Jiri Wiesner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/gUAdaFf20PDUkO@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox