From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB56C05027 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230218AbjBFOvx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:51:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36818 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229875AbjBFOvv (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:51:51 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0CF25BAC for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 06:51:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56378B8117E for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D26B4C433EF; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:51:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1675695108; bh=aKJvfXS+xxZnv3cht3EfQwkvwp4dT7OrFf4PKvTWc48=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uv4TfxJd3NoBs57skRukIbXGaaywY6Clt/BrkA0majQZzbFhMf5RglHspPDjbengZ e1yyfXu/0ysWWsVYe7XfSM39wSbvpXH8DRngL01EI2K7Ga9LCrR7HoijcUvJRt/1ls LzT0AhqRJI410Ihf/Wp/C3MHkIVl7aZwHVp8X9wxt7kHuPaEQesx9L+OUO/wbUG74E F01XmtH4MTH/iIKB8XiJ1ycZAr7Sj8nIOKYucTGzd7WQvHBcrQrkTW8ocF4XTy2ykm EN5aIVuPS1lKnmmTMbDqNv6aezLLVpRhg/+Us/8FhJkVY90DhSGrkwJHdb2SuCQOdq FlmxQKER020kQ== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA903405BE; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:51:44 -0300 (-03) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:51:44 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com, irogers@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/9] perf/x86/msr: Add Meteor Lake support Message-ID: References: <20230104201349.1451191-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20230104201349.1451191-7-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <79807730-73ac-c8c2-fc9d-b7cd00f9336e@linux.intel.com> <47f5639d-a64e-9c85-a62b-40160d02d3ff@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47f5639d-a64e-9c85-a62b-40160d02d3ff@linux.intel.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 09:32:00AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > On 2023-02-03 3:28 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 05:21:15PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > >> Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:34:02AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu: > >>> Hi Arnaldo, > >>> > >>> On 2023-02-01 8:47 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>>> Em Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 12:13:47PM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu: > >>>>> From: Kan Liang > >>>>> > >>>>> Meteor Lake is Intel's successor to Raptor lake. PPERF and SMI_COUNT MSRs > >>>>> are also supported. > >>>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang > >>>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> Did the kernel bits land upstream? > >>> Yes, the kernel part has been merged into the tip.git perf/core branch. > >>> > >>> Thanks for checking the status. There are two perf tool patches in this > >>> series, which hasn't been merged. Should I resend them? > >> > >> Lemme try cherry-picking just the tooling bits from this series. > > > > Sorry, I forgot to mention it in this thread. > I sent V3 with only perf tool patches. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230202192209.1795329-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/ > > > There was a clash with: > > > > commit 3fd7a168bf51497909dbfb7347af28b5c57e74a6 > > Author: Namhyung Kim > > Date: Thu Jan 26 13:36:10 2023 -0800 > > > > perf script: Add 'cgroup' field for output > > > > And a minor fuzz on the first patch, I applied manually and resolved the > > conflict, > > The V3 add a perf test case for the new field. Could you please apply it > as well? > > Sorry for the inconvenience. np, I'll pick the test and apply it as well, Thanks for letting me know, - Arnaldo