From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] perf test: Support the retire_lat check
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:32:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+EdposucD4mWp6S@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e493d2f-827a-03d9-610b-6246502bf92a@linux.intel.com>
Em Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:17:46AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>
>
> On 2023-02-06 10:01 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:22:09AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
> >> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Add test for the new field for Retire Latency in the X86 specific test.
> >
> > Is this passing 'perf test' for you?
>
> Ah, it should be the original V2 missed the below change.
Can you please send this as a separate patch as I already merged
torvalds/master and added more csets on top, so to just fix it and
force push now would be bad.
Please use what is in my perf/core branch and add a Fixes for that v2
patch.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
> @@ -100,5 +101,25 @@ void arch_perf_synthesize_sample_weight(const
> struct perf_sample *data,
> if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
> *array &= 0xffffffff;
> *array |= ((u64)data->ins_lat << 32);
> + *array |= ((u64)data->retire_lat << 48);
> }
> }
>
> Could you please remove the V2 and re-apply the V3?
> $ sudo ./perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
> 74: x86 Sample parsing :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 3316797
> test child finished with 0
> ---- end ----
> x86 Sample parsing: Ok
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
> >
> > [root@quaco ~]# perf test -v "x86 sample parsing"
> > 74: x86 Sample parsing :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 72526
> > Samples differ at 'retire_lat'
> > parsing failed for sample_type 0x1000000
> > test child finished with -1
> > ---- end ----
> > x86 Sample parsing: FAILED!
> > [root@quaco ~]#
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> New patch since V2
> >>
> >> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 5 ++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> >> index 690c7c07e90d..a061e8619267 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
> >> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
> >> const struct perf_sample *s2,
> >> u64 type)
> >> {
> >> - if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT)
> >> + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT) {
> >> COMP(ins_lat);
> >> + COMP(retire_lat);
> >> + }
> >>
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >> @@ -48,6 +50,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type)
> >> struct perf_sample sample = {
> >> .weight = 101,
> >> .ins_lat = 102,
> >> + .retire_lat = 103,
> >> };
> >> struct perf_sample sample_out;
> >> size_t i, sz, bufsz;
> >> --
> >> 2.35.1
> >>
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 19:22 [PATCH V3 1/3] perf report: Support Retire Latency kan.liang
2023-02-02 19:22 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] perf script: " kan.liang
2023-02-02 19:22 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] perf test: Support the retire_lat check kan.liang
2023-02-06 15:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-06 15:17 ` Liang, Kan
2023-02-06 15:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-02-06 15:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-06 15:49 ` Liang, Kan
2023-02-06 16:25 ` Liang, Kan
2023-02-06 15:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+EdposucD4mWp6S@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox