Re: [RESEND] soc: qcom-geni-se: Update Tx and Rx fifo depth based on QUP HW version

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:54:13PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote:
> 
> On 2/6/2023 11:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > A:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
> > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > A: Top-posting.
> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> > 
> > A: No.
> > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> 
> Apologies will take care.
> 
> > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:36:49PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote:
> > > Added RESEND for resubmission of first version which is not modified in any
> > > way from the previous submission.
> > 
> > Then why was it resent?  What will cause this to be accepted when the
> > previous submission was not?
> > 
> > confused,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/11/21/549
> 
> I had posted the same patch in November last year but did not receive any
> response in spite of periodic reminders.
> 
> Suspecting that the patch did not reach all the required recipients
> re-posted the same and hence RESEND.

When you resend, you need to say _why_ it was resent.  "adding more
people" is a valid reason, don't make us guess.

Remember, some of us get hundreds of patches a day/week to review, we
have no saved context.

thanks,

greg k-h