From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Power herobrine's 3.3 eDP/TS rail more properly
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:09:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+PlbAVDLoSUKJ7U@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207163550.1.I5ff72b7746d5fca8f10ea61351bde4150ed1a7f8@changeid>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:36:10PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This is the equivalent of commit f5b4811e8758 ("arm64: dts: qcom:
> sc7180: Add trogdor eDP/touchscreen regulator off-on-time") and commit
> 23ff866987de ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Start the trogdor
> eDP/touchscreen regulator on"), but for herobrine instead of trogdor.
>
> The motivations for herobrine are the same as for trogdor.
>
> NOTES:
> * Currently for herobrine all boards are eDP, not MIPI. If/when we
> have herobrine derivatives that are MIPI they we can evaluate
> whether the same off-on-delay makes sense for them. For trogdor we
> didn't add the delay to MIPI panels because the problem was found
> late and nobody had complained about it. For herobrine defaulting to
> assuming the same 500ms makes sense and if we find we need to
> optimize later we can.
> * Currently there are no oddball herobrine boards like homestar where
> the panel really likes to be power cycled. If we have an oddball
> board it will need to split the eDP and touchscreen rail anyway
> (like homestar did) and we'll have to delete the "regulator-boot-on"
> from that board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> This patch should be applied atop my recent series adjusting the
> herobrine touchscreen rails [1]. If I need to send a v2 of that series
> I will add this at the end of it as patch #8.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207024816.525938-1-dianders@chromium.org/
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi
> index ded36b5d28c7..312cc0e1cbc7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi
> @@ -110,6 +110,22 @@ pp3300_left_in_mlb: pp3300-left-in-mlb-regulator {
>
> regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <3000>;
>
> + /*
> + * eDP panel specs nearly always have a spec that says you
uber-nit: you could replace the second 'spec' with 'requirement' to avoid
the repetition.
> + * shouldn't turn them off an on again without waiting 500ms.
> + * Add this as a board constraint since this rail is shared
> + * between the panel and touchscreen.
> + */
> + off-on-delay-us = <500000>;
> +
> + /*
> + * Stat the regulator on. This has the advantage of starting
s/Stat/Start/ ?
> + * the slow process of powering the panel on as soon as we
> + * probe the regulator. It also avoids tripping the
> + * off-on-delay immediately on every bootup.
> + */
> + regulator-boot-on;
> +
> vin-supply = <&pp3300_z1>;
> };
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-08 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 0:36 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Power herobrine's 3.3 eDP/TS rail more properly Douglas Anderson
2023-02-08 8:17 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-08 18:09 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2023-02-09 4:22 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+PlbAVDLoSUKJ7U@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox