[PATCH 0/3] A few cleanup patches for blk-iolatency.c

[PATCH 0/3] A few cleanup patches for blk-iolatency.c

[Kemeng Shi]

This series contains three cleanup patches to remove redundant check,
correct comment and simplify struct iolatency_grp in blk-iolatency.c.

Kemeng Shi (3):
  block: Remove redundant parent blkcg_gp check in check_scale_change
  block: Correct comment for scale_cookie_change
  block: Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int in struct
    iolatency_grp

 block/blk-iolatency.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.0

[PATCH 1/3] block: Remove redundant parent blkcg_gp check in check_scale_change

[Kemeng Shi]

Function blkcg_iolatency_throttle will make sure blkg->parent is not
NULL before calls check_scale_change. And function check_scale_change
is only called in blkcg_iolatency_throttle.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-iolatency.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index e285152345a2..a8cc5abe91e5 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -403,9 +403,6 @@ static void check_scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat)
 	u64 scale_lat;
 	int direction = 0;
 
-	if (lat_to_blkg(iolat)->parent == NULL)
-		return;
-
 	parent = blkg_to_lat(lat_to_blkg(iolat)->parent);
 	if (!parent)
 		return;
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Remove redundant parent blkcg_gp check in check_scale_change

[Josef Bacik]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Function blkcg_iolatency_throttle will make sure blkg->parent is not
> NULL before calls check_scale_change. And function check_scale_change
> is only called in blkcg_iolatency_throttle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef

[PATCH 2/3] block: Correct comment for scale_cookie_change

[Kemeng Shi]

Default queue depth of iolatency_grp is unlimited, so we scale down
quickly(once by half) in scale_cookie_change. Remove the "subtract
1/16th" part which is not the truth.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-iolatency.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index a8cc5abe91e5..2666afd7abdb 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void scale_cookie_change(struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat,
 }
 
 /*
- * Change the queue depth of the iolatency_grp.  We add/subtract 1/16th of the
+ * Change the queue depth of the iolatency_grp.  We add 1/16th of the
  * queue depth at a time so we don't get wild swings and hopefully dial in to
  * fairer distribution of the overall queue depth.
  */
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Correct comment for scale_cookie_change

[Josef Bacik]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Default queue depth of iolatency_grp is unlimited, so we scale down
> quickly(once by half) in scale_cookie_change. Remove the "subtract
> 1/16th" part which is not the truth.
>

Ok sure, but at least update the comment to indicate what we actually do when
scaling down.  Thanks,

Josef 

[PATCH 3/3] block: Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int in struct iolatency_grp

[Kemeng Shi]

We only need a max queue depth for every iolatency to limit the inflight io
number. Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int to simplfy "struct
iolatency_grp" and save memory.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-iolatency.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index 2666afd7abdb..55bc742d3b66 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct iolatency_grp {
 	struct latency_stat __percpu *stats;
 	struct latency_stat cur_stat;
 	struct blk_iolatency *blkiolat;
-	struct rq_depth rq_depth;
+	unsigned int max_depth;
 	struct rq_wait rq_wait;
 	atomic64_t window_start;
 	atomic_t scale_cookie;
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void iolat_cleanup_cb(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data)
 static bool iolat_acquire_inflight(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data)
 {
 	struct iolatency_grp *iolat = private_data;
-	return rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, iolat->rq_depth.max_depth);
+	return rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, iolat->max_depth);
 }
 
 static void __blkcg_iolatency_throttle(struct rq_qos *rqos,
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, bool up)
 {
 	unsigned long qd = iolat->blkiolat->rqos.q->nr_requests;
 	unsigned long scale = scale_amount(qd, up);
-	unsigned long old = iolat->rq_depth.max_depth;
+	unsigned long old = iolat->max_depth;
 
 	if (old > qd)
 		old = qd;
@@ -384,12 +384,12 @@ static void scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, bool up)
 		if (old < qd) {
 			old += scale;
 			old = min(old, qd);
-			iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = old;
+			iolat->max_depth = old;
 			wake_up_all(&iolat->rq_wait.wait);
 		}
 	} else {
 		old >>= 1;
-		iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = max(old, 1UL);
+		iolat->max_depth = max(old, 1UL);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static void check_scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat)
 	}
 
 	/* We're as low as we can go. */
-	if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == 1 && direction < 0) {
+	if (iolat->max_depth == 1 && direction < 0) {
 		blkcg_use_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat));
 		return;
 	}
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void check_scale_change(struct iolatency_grp *iolat)
 	/* We're back to the default cookie, unthrottle all the things. */
 	if (cur_cookie == DEFAULT_SCALE_COOKIE) {
 		blkcg_clear_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat));
-		iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = UINT_MAX;
+		iolat->max_depth = UINT_MAX;
 		wake_up_all(&iolat->rq_wait.wait);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void iolatency_record_time(struct iolatency_grp *iolat,
 	 * We don't want to count issue_as_root bio's in the cgroups latency
 	 * statistics as it could skew the numbers downwards.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(issue_as_root && iolat->rq_depth.max_depth != UINT_MAX)) {
+	if (unlikely(issue_as_root && iolat->max_depth != UINT_MAX)) {
 		u64 sub = iolat->min_lat_nsec;
 		if (req_time < sub)
 			blkcg_add_delay(lat_to_blkg(iolat), now, sub - req_time);
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static void iolatency_ssd_stat(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, struct seq_file *s)
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 
-	if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == UINT_MAX)
+	if (iolat->max_depth == UINT_MAX)
 		seq_printf(s, " missed=%llu total=%llu depth=max",
 			(unsigned long long)stat.ps.missed,
 			(unsigned long long)stat.ps.total);
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static void iolatency_ssd_stat(struct iolatency_grp *iolat, struct seq_file *s)
 		seq_printf(s, " missed=%llu total=%llu depth=%u",
 			(unsigned long long)stat.ps.missed,
 			(unsigned long long)stat.ps.total,
-			iolat->rq_depth.max_depth);
+			iolat->max_depth);
 }
 
 static void iolatency_pd_stat(struct blkg_policy_data *pd, struct seq_file *s)
@@ -941,12 +941,12 @@ static void iolatency_pd_stat(struct blkg_policy_data *pd, struct seq_file *s)
 
 	avg_lat = div64_u64(iolat->lat_avg, NSEC_PER_USEC);
 	cur_win = div64_u64(iolat->cur_win_nsec, NSEC_PER_MSEC);
-	if (iolat->rq_depth.max_depth == UINT_MAX)
+	if (iolat->max_depth == UINT_MAX)
 		seq_printf(s, " depth=max avg_lat=%llu win=%llu",
 			avg_lat, cur_win);
 	else
 		seq_printf(s, " depth=%u avg_lat=%llu win=%llu",
-			iolat->rq_depth.max_depth, avg_lat, cur_win);
+			iolat->max_depth, avg_lat, cur_win);
 }
 
 static struct blkg_policy_data *iolatency_pd_alloc(gfp_t gfp,
@@ -990,9 +990,7 @@ static void iolatency_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
 	latency_stat_init(iolat, &iolat->cur_stat);
 	rq_wait_init(&iolat->rq_wait);
 	spin_lock_init(&iolat->child_lat.lock);
-	iolat->rq_depth.queue_depth = blkg->q->nr_requests;
-	iolat->rq_depth.max_depth = UINT_MAX;
-	iolat->rq_depth.default_depth = iolat->rq_depth.queue_depth;
+	iolat->max_depth = UINT_MAX;
 	iolat->blkiolat = blkiolat;
 	iolat->cur_win_nsec = 100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
 	atomic64_set(&iolat->window_start, now);
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int in struct iolatency_grp

[Josef Bacik]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:40:55PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> We only need a max queue depth for every iolatency to limit the inflight io
> number. Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int to simplfy "struct
> iolatency_grp" and save memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Thanks,

Josef

Re: [PATCH 0/3] A few cleanup patches for blk-iolatency.c

[Kemeng Shi]

Friendly ping ...

on 9/29/2022 3:40 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> This series contains three cleanup patches to remove redundant check,
> correct comment and simplify struct iolatency_grp in blk-iolatency.c.
> 
> Kemeng Shi (3):
>   block: Remove redundant parent blkcg_gp check in check_scale_change
>   block: Correct comment for scale_cookie_change
>   block: Replace struct rq_depth with unsigned int in struct
>     iolatency_grp
> 
>  block/blk-iolatency.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi