public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Backlight for v6.1
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 14:16:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0AmmR2NfKc/Y7Mb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whK-q1W-X0q0f_nBJ9sKyta-DVJhEAS4BF_oKAVAUQ4Jw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 05 Oct 2022, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:44 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >    - Add support for MediaTek MT6370 Backlight
> 
> Hmm. This new driver has a
> 
>         depends on MFD_MT6370
> 
> but there is no such symbol anywhere.
> 
> It turns out the same is true of the MT6370 regulator driver that was
> added during the previous merge window.
> 
> I do see that MFD_MT6370 in linux-next, but I don't see any pull
> request for this, and now that I started looking I do see that we had
> this already in 6.0.
> 
> I do *not* believe that it's ok to randomly take "drivers" that depend
> on functionality that hasn't even been merged yet, and that are
> basically just dead code but hidden away this non-obvious way.
> 
> I've pulled this, but I want to just state that this is bad, bad, bad.
> If it has dependencies that aren't met, it damn well shouldn't be sent
> upstream in a form where upstream can't even build test the thing.

PR satisfying this dependency was submitted the following day:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yz6Zi7B2RS16sXhT@google.com/

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-07 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-05 12:44 [GIT PULL] Backlight for v6.1 Lee Jones
2022-10-05 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-10-07 13:16   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2022-10-07 18:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-10-08 18:30       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-08 19:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-10-08 19:59           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-08 23:23             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-10-09 12:58               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-20  3:31                 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-10-20 13:48                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-20 13:53                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-10  7:42       ` Lee Jones
2022-10-05 18:40 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0AmmR2NfKc/Y7Mb@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox