public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: Reorganize css_set_lock and kernfs path processing
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:22:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0PWSlNmWT+1mkvB@blackbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yz21I9UpXafWMU0K@slm.duckdns.org>

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:47:31AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hmm... isn't current's root cgrp guaranteed to be alive?

True on the default hierarchy. v1 hierarchies (singular ones with root
cgroup only) can be unmounted.

> How would cgroup_get_live() fail?

kill_sb is not synchronized via css_set_lock.

> Also, shouldn't cgroup_get() enough for path walking?

If ref count dropped to zero, release callback (css_release_work_fn)
would be queued, cgroup_get would increase the refcount but it won't
cancel this.

Note these were concerns with the first version of the patch that also touched
cgroup_show_path() (that processes v1 hierarchies too). With the
reduction I avoided this.

Strictly speaking, even css_set_lock is unnecessary around
current_cgns_cgroup_from_root() when called with cgrp_dfl_root as the
cset->cgrp_links is not traversed at all.

> If you really wanna do it this way, can you please add a detailed comment
> here why this is safe? But I'd prefer just doing a strightforward ref
> inc/dec around it.

I see the the extraction under css_set_lock without inc/dec turns out
confusing. Let me expand the idea above and avoid css_set_lock
completely (another message).

Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 17:09 [PATCH] cgroup: Reorganize css_set_lock and kernfs path processing Michal Koutný
2022-09-06 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2022-09-28 11:33   ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Koutný
2022-10-05 16:47     ` Tejun Heo
2022-10-10  8:22       ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2022-10-10  8:29       ` [PATCH v3] " Michal Koutný
2022-10-10 20:24         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0PWSlNmWT+1mkvB@blackbook \
    --to=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox