From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A9FC4332F for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229696AbiJKUgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:36:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229994AbiJKUf6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:35:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28669DF97; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id b4so23371734wrs.1; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yM7le9rhqxSXpgbFxwaPbQQ1TFrB7VRUEQW1kSUpXmU=; b=T+d2Slk5PbXg8XMD5Lg1iNy0E+lWg7JGmKWaDHQORIt/6M9zo1p/sCf1uf2Jd1E74Y tOxGSAmxiV6L3AvtJ/c/Otf0aQPYrejk48fs+4Rni8rhb0zkKiqqcJfcq/Pvkjw36MQV F2ZifXwkXJ2isQuYUrCbUtV8EE6TDU/1QIWGHJPZ7F7S/5X3V2GD2dqZqB+ddJtvYxdd bLNkjJHfb4lq/fJPnOZDIv5M9M6eeUjsKxXtJWYurwVYxTqT6a0zcOxz357Gqd2/CgUZ 4DAE8dGdTnWWxjX9KaYw1GnvWH+JRg6USOzhRa17JrXses9NYUlwz2YH7BsdeOCViRnf pOhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yM7le9rhqxSXpgbFxwaPbQQ1TFrB7VRUEQW1kSUpXmU=; b=pYXrEeYP0HLQjsmYx5W4N8ELlc1jJvCzsJLU8spiQ8dE4Dh2Yc/siL+oPL7wii6eq3 1DotPh8PvEo5EJBJEyTUeWYo2NyqOpOAmmnd16NX5/V2KffVE/17pLHmrAausdOq/8MY kHsbJMws5yD/TuXqiIXsv9hxWtuEf1KSLZwgzsR97/QhWrA3K8QGe8ZABUNnoa3bpKJJ xnReqLFh3lZlmGWQ0U/zHwdByxXzkF2ElowpKHJV1VHjUJNK0ebDZopaCxdZeco5A4bn uPJa1LAmxAItUh64r+u6gcnpqHX9PdkMqM66ZDor3QArioig7NGfrtystT0TrzK26umy ieSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf19G62ObIrFJt2aZGK330oghkXn/yy6V15yyd9feSlaCjbiHhLX TWKIWWzYBDoAAEC2O9zp4F0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6sizIYtV1Qi03T5A5crlK+OcFeVVmzMXvjlAtziQBR7R5nRi8mpVjFGnhcOD/o19ihGzv9uQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:59a4:0:b0:230:eaa4:88d7 with SMTP id p4-20020a5d59a4000000b00230eaa488d7mr6513585wrr.35.1665520549917; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g17-20020a05600c001100b003c6bbe910fdsm23178wmc.9.2022.10.11.13.35.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 21:35:47 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/17] 6.0.1-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221010070330.159911806@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221010070330.159911806@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.1 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220925): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip