* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-10-14 12:10 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-14 14:47 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2022-10-14 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220925):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2002
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1994
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-14 12:10 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2022-10-14 14:47 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-10-14 17:30 ` Slade Watkins
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-10-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 13:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.74-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.74-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: e3d8c2f748861227f55b9dc8ba9e10b6f95e6ec4
* git describe: v5.15.73-34-ge3d8c2f74886
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.73-34-ge3d8c2f74886
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.73)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.73)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.73)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.73)
## Test result summary
total: 117411, pass: 101156, fail: 1769, skip: 13988, xfail: 498
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 333 total, 333 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 65 total, 63 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 56 total, 56 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 58 total, 56 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-14 12:10 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-14 14:47 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-10-14 17:30 ` Slade Watkins
2022-10-14 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Slade Watkins @ 2022-10-14 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 4:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
5.15.74-rc1 compiled and booted on my x86_64 test system. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
Thanks,
-srw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-14 17:30 ` Slade Watkins
@ 2022-10-14 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-10-14 23:07 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-10-14 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On 10/14/22 01:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.74-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-14 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-10-14 23:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-14 23:13 ` Kelsey Steele
2022-10-15 3:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-10-14 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 486 pass: 486 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-14 23:07 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-10-14 23:13 ` Kelsey Steele
2022-10-15 3:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2022-10-14 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Oct 2022 08:25:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 and WSL arm64
Built, booted, and compared dmesg against 5.15.73.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review
2022-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 5.15 00/33] 5.15.74-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-14 23:13 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2022-10-15 3:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2022-10-15 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:26:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.74 release.
> There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread