From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: cros-ec: Limit RTC alarm range if needed
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:36:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1/5nyplwrxSLg+M@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y19AdIntJZGnBh/y@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:26:44AM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 05:54:00PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Drop error messages in cros_ec_rtc_get() and cros_ec_rtc_set() since the
> > calling code also logs an error and to avoid spurious error messages if
> > setting the alarm ultimately succeeds.
>
> It only retries for cros_ec_rtc_set(). cros_ec_rtc_get() doesn't emit
> spurious error messages.
All of cros_ec_rtc_get()'s callers were also logging the same message.
So it was redundant. I think the general strategy here was to log the
error(s) in callers (last point before we "exit" the driver), to have
the best chance at context-relevant error messages, or ignoring them
where proper.
It's already a bit dubious to log kernel messages at all in response to
normal sysfs operations. We probably want them in some cases, when
things are particularly unexpected, but it shouldn't be a regular
occurrence, and we certainly don't need *two* log lines for each error.
Technically, if one wants to be super-nitpicky about one purpose per
patch, then maybe a patch to trim the logging, and a patch to fix the
alarm range issues...
...but I think that would be a little silly, and perhaps even harmful.
They are related concerns that should be patched (and probably
backported) together.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-29 0:54 [PATCH] rtc: cros-ec: Limit RTC alarm range if needed Guenter Roeck
2022-10-29 1:50 ` Brian Norris
2022-10-31 3:26 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-10-31 16:36 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2022-10-31 17:10 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-31 17:56 ` Brian Norris
2022-10-31 21:55 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-31 22:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-31 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-31 22:14 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-31 23:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-11-02 18:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-11-07 22:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-11-08 16:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-11-14 18:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1/5nyplwrxSLg+M@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox