From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: shaggy@kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+5fc38b2ddbbca7f5c680@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: Fix fortify moan in symlink
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:49:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1beLWto/J2W1Stu@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202210241021.6E9E1EF65@keescook>
* Kees Cook (keescook@chromium.org) wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 09:39:14PM +0100, linux@treblig.org wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
> >
> > JFS has in jfs_incore.h:
> >
> > /* _inline may overflow into _inline_ea when needed */
> > /* _inline_ea may overlay the last part of
> > * file._xtroot if maxentry = XTROOTINITSLOT
> > */
> > union {
> > struct {
> > /* 128: inline symlink */
> > unchar _inline[128];
> > /* 128: inline extended attr */
> > unchar _inline_ea[128];
> > };
> > unchar _inline_all[256];
> >
> > and currently the symlink code copies into _inline;
> > if this is larger than 128 bytes it triggers a fortify warning of the
> > form:
> >
> > memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 132) of single field
> > "ip->i_link" at fs/jfs/namei.c:950 (size 18446744073709551615)
>
> Which compiler are you using for this build?
I think that report was the same on gcc on Fedora 37 and whatever
syzkaller was running.
> This size report (SIZE_MAX)
> should be impossible to reach. But also, the size is just wrong --
> i_inline is 128 bytes, not SIZE_MAX. So, the detection is working
> (132 > 128), but the report is broken, and I can't see how...
Yeh, and led me down a blind alley for a while thinking something had
really managed to screwup the strlen somehow.
>
> >
> > when it's actually OK.
> >
> > Copy it into _inline_all instead.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+5fc38b2ddbbca7f5c680@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
> > ---
> > fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > index 9db4f5789c0ec..4fbbf88435e69 100644
> > --- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static int jfs_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *dip,
> > if (ssize <= IDATASIZE) {
> > ip->i_op = &jfs_fast_symlink_inode_operations;
> >
> > - ip->i_link = JFS_IP(ip)->i_inline;
> > + ip->i_link = JFS_IP(ip)->i_inline_all;
> > memcpy(ip->i_link, name, ssize);
> > ip->i_size = ssize - 1;
> >
>
> Regardless, the fix looks correct to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thanks!
Dave
> --
> Kees Cook
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-22 20:39 [PATCH] jfs: Fix fortify moan in symlink linux
2022-10-24 17:28 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-24 18:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2022-10-27 22:18 ` Dave Kleikamp
2022-10-28 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-29 12:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-11-01 21:57 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1beLWto/J2W1Stu@gallifrey \
--to=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+5fc38b2ddbbca7f5c680@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox